New target: Tottenham scouts left hugely impressed by £26m "diamond" winger

Tottenham Hotspur are now keeping close tabs on a winger, with scouts being left hugely impressed by his recent performances, according to a report.

Spurs planning to bolster attacking options

It would be fair to say Tottenham’s forwards have not been the main issue this season, with Ange Postecoglou’s side scoring 60 goals in the Premier League up to this point, the third-highest of any side in the top flight.

However, it is clear Spurs are eager to bring in additional attacking options this summer, having stepped up their pursuit of a winger in recent weeks, most recently being named as potential suitors for Bayern Munich’s Kingsley Coman, with the Frenchman making it clear he wants to leave.

West Ham United’s Mohammed Kudus is amongst the targets from within the Premier League, but the Ghanaian will not come cheap, with the Lilywhites’ London rivals reportedly set to hold out for a fee of £74m.

Tottenham want to sign "brilliant" £30m left-back who could replace Udogie

Tottenham have now joined the race to sign “one of the best left-backs in Europe”.

ByDominic Lund Apr 13, 2025

Chairman Daniel Levy recently confirmed Tottenham’s spending must be “sustainable” and “smart” in the summer, amid a drop in revenue in the year ending June 2024, so it could make sense to pursue a low-cost alternative to Kudus.

According to a report from The Boot Room, a new target has now entered the frame, with Tottenham scouts being left hugely impressed by Strasbourg winger Dilane Bakwa after recently watching him in action.

Paris St Germain's Lucas Hernandez in action with RC Strasbourg'sDilaneBakwa

Spurs are keeping close tabs on Bakwa, but there could be fierce competition for his signature from their London rivals, with Chelsea, Brentford and West Ham United also interested, alongside Newcastle United.

It remains to be seen whether Chelsea’s relationship with Strasbourg gives them the edge in negotiations, but a deal may be possible for the relatively low fee of £26m.

Tottenham Hotspur’s upcoming fixtures

Date

Eintracht Frankfurt (a)

April 17th

Nottingham Forest (h)

April 21st

Liverpool (a)

April 27th

West Ham United (a)

May 3rd

Crystal Palace (h)

May 10th

"Diamond" Bakwa enjoying impressive campaign

Under the helm of Liam Rosenior, Strasbourg are making an unexpected push for the Champions League places in Ligue 1 this season, and the 22-year-old has been integral to their success, picking up four goals and nine assists in 25 appearances.

In light of his impressive performances in France, the young winger has received high praise from journalist Zach Lowy, who described him as a “diamond in the rough” back in January.

A fee of just £26m for the Frenchman could be a bargain, should he continue his current trajectory, so it is exciting news that Tottenham have been monitoring his performances ahead of a potential swoop.

That said, Chelsea owners BlueCo are also in charge at Strasbourg, which could make a deal challenging, given that they may be unwilling to strengthen a direct rival.

New York, new challenges as Sri Lanka begin a long road

Wanindu Hasaranga was hopeful conditions wouldn’t be too far removed from home

Sidharth Monga03-Jun-20241:20

Will Hasaranga be the gamechanger?

Puff of dust. Not on the pitch but on the outfield. That’s the first thing you notice about cricket at the Nassau County International Cricket Ground just outside New York City. The next thing you see is that the ball plugs in it. It doesn’t zip off like we are used to seeing in pretty standard conditions in cricket on TV these days. It is a sandy outfield where fielders won’t be queuing up to dive.Then there is the drop-in pitch. In the warm-up game between India and Bangladesh held two days before the ground hosts its first World Cup match, the ball seamed around and also sat in the surface. Yet again, these are anything but standard conditions. And because of reasons not explained to the South Africa and Sri Lanka teams, they go into the match without any training session at the actual venue.Related

  • T20 World Cup travel tales: Who's got an advantage, who doesn't?

  • Aiden Markram is not your typical South African captain (and that's a good thing)

  • The power of South Africa against the variety of Sri Lanka

  • Markram 'grateful' for tough start as young captain

This is precisely why South Africa requested for at least a fielding session on the actual outfield after they were done with their nets at the Cantiague Park, another facility outside New York City. Even during the India-Bangladesh match, their coach Rob Walter and bowling coach Eric Simons made it a point to come to the venue and check the conditions out.Sri Lanka, on the other hand, will visit the venue for the first time when they come in for the match. They even cancelled their nets session at the Cantiague Park. They have decided what they saw of the warm-up game on the TV is all they need to know. That is not as dramatic as it sounds because conditions are a little similar to Sri Lanka: sticky pitch, heavy outfield. That is what they have seen in their other practice sessions as well.”First of all, we prepared really well,” Sri Lanka’s captain Wanindu Hasaranga said. “We came two weeks early to North Carolina, and we had practice sessions there. And we played two practice matches in Florida. And I think as a team, we prepared really well. And conditions are similar to Sri Lanka. So, I think as a team we have prepared really well.”Wanindu Hasaranga was confident his side were ready•AFP/Getty ImagesYou can detect some sulkiness with Sri Lanka, though. Firstly, their flight into New York was delayed by seven hours. Then, unlike India and South Africa, they are staying in downtown Brooklyn, which makes it quite a trek to the ground. Their hotel’s swimming pool is closed for the rest of the year, a repeat for them from the 2019 World Cup in England. In fact when asked about adjusting to early-morning starts this World Cup – to cater to the TV audience in India – Hasaranga didn’t omit to mention the travel to the ground.”No, if we played under lights, then we have to prepare, with the field and everything under the lights,” Hasaranga said when asked if they needed to make adjustments to early starts. “Then the only concern is we have to come early to the ground. We have to come at 7.30 in the morning because we are so far from the ground. It will take like one-and-a-half hours to the ground. That’s the only concern we have.”Hasaranga is not incorrect. During the warm-up match, almost everyone had trouble getting to the ground with the police closing down the entrances to Eisenhower Park, which houses the stadium. Everyone is hopeful there is better co-ordination between the police and the ICC come match day when the roads will be closed at 7.30am for everyone except the team buses.2:01

South Africa batters vs Sri Lanka spinners

And then there is the frequent travel for them. Along with Netherlands, Sri Lanka are one of the only two teams that will play all their four first-round matches in four different venues. So they will be in a loop of match-travel-train-optional train-match through then first round.We can sometimes not appreciate the small little challenges that can accumulate with these daily things. For example, when you are asked to train at another venue a day before the match, this is what happens: you load the cricket kits in the hotel at the team bus, then you unload them at the training facility, then you load again and go to your hotel, then you unload in the morning at the ground and load again because you have to travel immediately and don’t have the luxury of playing another match at the same venue.South Africa were more philosophical with the logistical challenges that are part of coming to a new country, which on top of that is not used to hosting cricket, but they do get to play three matches in New York. Even they were bemused they had to train elsewhere. They didn’t know a reason why. Asked if they would have rather they trained at the venue of the match, their captain Aiden Markram said: “It’s hard to say because I’m not sure what [training facility] is there [at the venue of the match], because I haven’t been there. This facility is incredible to be honest, so we don’t mind training here either.”

Has any Zimbabwe player made a higher score in a successful ODI chase than Sikandar Raza?

And has a team ever fielded 11 left-handed batters in an international match?

Steven Lynch09-Aug-2022Has any Zimbabwean player made a higher score in a successful ODI run-chase than Sikandar Raza last week? asked Ollie Hastings from Zimbabwe
Sikandar Raza’s 135 not out as his side overhauled Bangladesh’s 303 for 2 in Harare last week – he ended the match with his sixth six – has been bettered for Zimbabwe only by… Sikandar Raza, who hit 141 when they beat Afghanistan in Bulawayo in July 2014. In all, there have now been 13 centuries for Zimbabwe in successful ODI run-chases, including Innocent Kaia’s 110 in the same game as Sikandar last week, as well as those by Sikandar and Regis Chakabva in the second match in Harare on Sunday.In the second T20 in St Kitts, India’s batters were all out in scorecard order – has this happened before? asked Niraj Mohammed from India
In India’s innings in that match against West Indies in St Kitts last week, No. 1 Rohit Sharma was the first man out, and Nos. 2 to 10 obligingly followed suit in order, leaving No. 11, Arshdeep Singh, not out. This pleasing progression had happened only one before in a T20 international, by Sri Lanka as they slid to defeat against Pakistan in Colombo in August 2009.There have also been two instances in one-day internationals, by India against Australia in Visakhapatnam in April 2001, and West Indies vs South Africa in Grenada the following month.This calculation is more problematic for Test matches, as it’s not always known which opener took first strike (and was therefore No. 1), and occasionally we are not absolutely sure about the batting order, especially if it was changed in the second innings. The ESPNcricinfo database currently shows four cases of Nos 1-10 being out in numerical order, but according to additional research from the Australian statistician Charles Davis, who has studied hundreds of original scorebooks, two of these are incorrect: in England’s second innings against South Africa in Cape Town in 1909-10, Frederick Fane actually went in before Frank Woolley, while for Australia vs West Indies in Georgetown in 1964-65, Bill Lawry took first strike in the second innings, rather than Bob Simpson. Says Charles: “Lawry and Simpson were the first opening pair to regularly swap places between first and second innings. Most (but not all) Australian opening pairs have done the same since. Online scorecards frequently miss this.”That leaves just England’s first innings against South Africa in Johannesburg in 1948-49, and Pakistan vs England at Old Trafford in 2001 (second innings).However, thanks to Charles’ research we can add three more: Australia vs England in Adelaide in 1911-12 (Charles Kelleway took first strike in the second innings, not Warren Bardsley), South Africa vs Australia in Johannesburg in 1966-67 (Graeme Pollock was out before Colin Bland in the second innings), and England vs New Zealand at Lord’s in 1978 (Ian Botham was out before Bob Taylor in the first innings).The last time a team fielded eight left-hand batters in a Test – the most – was by Australia in the 2013-14 Ashes•Getty ImagesHas a team ever fielded 11 left-hand batters in a Test, or any other international match? asked Bijul Raveendran from India
The most left-handers fielded by one team in a men’s Test is eight, which has happened three times: by West Indies against Pakistan in Georgetown in 1999-2000, and by West Indies against England at The Oval later in 2000; and by England against Australia in Sydney in 2013-14. There are 38 further instances of a team having seven left-handers.There’s also one case of nine left-handers in men’s T20Is, by Bangladesh against Zimbabwe in Harare in July 2021; the only right-handers were Mahmudullah, the captain, and wicketkeeper Nurul Hasan. There have been five further cases of eight, all by Bangladesh. In ODIs the most is seven, which has happened on no fewer than 46 occasions.Sri Lanka’s women can match that, however: in successive one-day internationals in 2016 against England in Colombo (November 12 and 15) their side included nine left-handers.Apparently two of the characters in Chess are named after Test cricketers. Which two? asked Kevin Robertson from England
The lyrics for the musical Chess were written in the early 1980s by Tim Rice and Abba’s Bjorn Ulvaeus, with music by Ulvaeus and Benny Andersson. I think it’s a fair bet that most of the character names came from Sir Tim, a noted cricket lover and former MCC president. The plot pits an American chess grand-master against a Russian: the American is Freddie Trumper, a nod to the legendary Golden Age Australian batter Victor Trumper. The other hidden Test player is a less famous Aussie: Walter de Courcy, part of Trumper’s entourage (and later his boss), is apparently named after Jimmy de Courcy, the New South Wales batter who played three Tests in England in 1953. De Courcy turned into “Walter Anderson” when the show started on Broadway, but the New York debut came well before Jimmy’s first Test for England.Which cricketer called his autobiography Wrist Assured? asked Michael Mackay from Australia
This is the new book from the elegant Indian batter Gundappa Vishwanath, written with the help of journalist R Kaushik and published by Rupa Books in India earlier this year. It’s been a long time coming, given that Vishy played his last Test in 1982-83, but it is an entertaining trip down memory lane. Best of all, it’s a hardback! More and more books are coming out in paperback only, and they don’t last quite as well on the bulging bookshelves.Shiva Jayaraman of ESPNcricinfo’s stats team helped with some of the above answers.Use our feedback form, or the Ask Steven Facebook page to ask your stats and trivia questions

Ian Gould: 'Modern umpires have thrown away their egos because they understand DRS'

The former international umpire looks back at his career: the Ajmal lbw decision in the 2011 World Cup, two ball-tampering scandals, watching Steyn v Tendulkar, and more

Interview by Alan Gardner30-May-2020Ian Gould retired from the ICC’s panel of elite umpires in 2019, after standing in more than 250 international matches over a 13-year career. He has since written a book, My Life in Cricket, covering his time as a player for Middlesex, Sussex and England, his subsequent spell as a coach, and then the switch to umpiring. While on one of his regular walks along Hove seafront, he spoke about his experiences as an umpire, the importance of building relationships along the way, and his hopes for the season to come.You were set to be returning as an umpire on the county circuit this summer – but that must all be up in the air now?
I love umpiring. I really enjoy it and I owe it to the ECB because I’ve had 13-14 years swanning around the world and they’ve been looking after me. So I felt I deserved to come back and show my mettle that I want to carry on. Because whatever people talk about the Hundred, over the years I’ve been in the game, I’ve seen the 60-over game, the 50-over game, the 40-over game, and I remember doing the first T20 game at Bristol, and everyone said, “Well, this is just pub cricket.” Now we look back on that. It’s moved on very, very quickly.I was actually really looking forward to it [the Hundred] and I feel very sorry for the boys at the ECB that took some flak leading up to it. Now it’s wait until next year, but I’m sure it will take off.But you’re still keen to continue?
Oh yeah, without a doubt. I finished [as an international umpire] on July 6 and there was a big come-down. But then I went back to county cricket in the first week of August and I thought, hang on, I really do love this job and I really love the people involved in it. And it got me going again, so I’m not going to be sitting on me backside. I’m preparing for some cricket in late July. Whether that happens or not is two different matters.ALSO READ: Ian ‘Gunner’ Gould whistles his way into the sunsetDue to the Covid-19 situation, the ICC has signalled a “short-term” move to using local umpires in international cricket. Does that mean you could make a comeback, if the ECB succeeds in its plan to stage matches?
We’ve been warned it could happen. I think they’ll be looking at younger people than me. But I’d love to do that again. It was a proper stage and I thoroughly enjoyed it.But we’ve got a great group coming through. We’ve got the four boys [from England] at the elites – been strengthened now by Michael Gough replacing me. Michael is just going through the roof with his umpiring, and so are the other boys. Richard Illingworth, umpire of the year, Richard Kettleborough, three-times winner, Nigel Llong, very steady. I think they have appointed Martin Saggers, David Millns and Michael Burns, so if we do play any international cricket here, the game’s in real good hands.

“Umpires are not going to catch players [tampering with the ball]. Unless you do it right in front of my face, I’m not going to catch you. But cameramen will catch you”

In your book, you say that increased use of technology might lead to the end of neutral umpires. Do you think the ICC should look to make this a permanent change?
I have started to believe, probably in my last two years, that it might go down that road. Though I think the players would like it to stay neutral – that when everyone can travel again, we go back to where it was.I was lucky enough to go to the Under-19 World Cup this year, and I saw some outstanding umpires coming through. That was also at the same time as the Women’s T20 World Cup, so there’s another group of 12 there. The only difference will be that the guys that are here now have had 60-70 Test matches. Some of those other guys have maybe done two Test matches and 20 ODIs. But quite a number of those do the IPL with 80,000 screaming at you.I don’t think it’ll be a major problem, but the way the players are talking, from what I understand, they want to go back to how it was. I think there’s a fear factor. [The players] don’t know these other guys. People are saying there’s not four in South Africa. There are. There’s not four in Bangladesh. There are.I think they are talking now about six Test matches in nine weeks [as part of England’s reworked schedule], plus a few ODIs? So the four elite who are likely to do it, plus the three other lads, are going to have to be in lockdown for probably nine weeks. That is going to turn you stir-crazy.That also seems to be an argument for increasing the pool of eligible umpires.
The other side of it, not even in lockdown, was, we always thought it was a little unfair there was three Aussies and four English on the panel. It left five [who could officiate] when an Ashes series came, which is a massive series. I think three or four of those have done five or six [Ashes] series. Marais Erasmus, Aleem [Dar], Kumar [Dharmasena]. At the end of it, there’s just five of them. That makes it very, very difficult.I think the best umpires should umpire the biggest games. Whether it’s an Englishman at one end, say Richard Kettleborough, and Bruce Oxenford at the other end, or Rob Tucker, whatever way you want… because DRS now is not letting you go. If you’re making a mistake, you’re making a mistake. The only worry I think the boys would have is when you’ve got umpire’s call. You know, you can give an umpire’s call to England if you’re a Pom and not give it to Australia.You don’t want it going back to people saying, oh, this is biased. You can’t have that.Gould, a keeper-batsman, played 18 ODIs for England. Here, he bats against New South Wales in a tour game in 1982-83•Stuart William Macgladrie/Fairfax Media/Getty ImagesYou’ve written about the episode of burnout you suffered in 2016, in part due to the amount of travel and time away from home. Is that something the ICC should be taking into account?
I think it is. It was a very difficult time for me, and I pray that I don’t see [it happen to] anybody, but I do believe there’s been one or two that have not been their normal self. And there’s always this fear of [showing] weakness – “You shouldn’t be talking about this.”I’m listening to young Dominic Bess now. He’s a very bright, nice kid. And he’s openly saying: don’t have a fear of talking to people. If I bump into someone now, I say, “Are you are you okay? Look, mate, I’ve got an hour. Come on, let’s chat it out.” Whereas a year ago, I don’t think I would have said that.Putting your passport in the fridge after returning home was a sign to you that something was wrong. But how long did it take to confront the issue and talk about it?
Six weeks, eight weeks, maybe longer. Once I got on the field, I was integrated with some great players and really fantastic people. But it’s when you went back to your hotel room and you just thought, “Well, what am I doing?” Or a car comes to pick you up to take you to the airport. “Why am I doing this?'”ALSO READ: Which umpire fares the best when reviewed by DRS?I was going for a trip to the West Indies. St Lucia, Barbados, and somewhere else, somewhere beautiful. And I didn’t want to go. I’m looking at myself: “What you thinking here, Ian, you’ve got six weeks in the Caribbean. In February, when it’s freezing in London.” I didn’t want to do it. But once I got on that flight and got there, it was a different story.I was walking down through Hove and I was jumping into shops to avoid people. I didn’t want to hold a conversation because I knew someone would look at me and go, “What’s your problem?”I listened to Marcus Trescothick on a podcast talking about it. I spoke to Michael Yardy about it. Suddenly I was talking to people about it, and it was like, well, that’s me. The awareness now is much greater. We’re lucky that we have the ECB, who were outstanding when I sort of blurted it out. Chris Kelly [the ECB’s umpires’ manager] was unbelievable. He rang me every other day. Dennis Burns, my coach at the ICC, people that I really trust, just rang me and rang me and talked and talked, recommended books I should read and told me to stop drinking like a lunatic.

“I think the best umpires should umpire the biggest games, because DRS now is not letting you go. If you’re making a mistake, you’re making a mistake”

On the subject of scrapping neutral umpires, you would presumably have loved to umpire an Ashes Test?
I was speaking to Richard Kettleborough about it. Richard’s very quiet about things, but when we started talking, you could hear that little bit of joy in his voice. You could almost hear his mind ticking. “Well, how great would that be?” Immense amount of pressure, but he can turn around and say, “Look, I umpired a Test against Australia at Lord’s” – or Birmingham, or wherever.We’re lucky because we’ve got so much county cricket to gain experience, and that’s the biggest thing within the group now at ECB and international, is habit. England, April 1, the season starts and you just get in that routine.What do you think about adding an extra review, to deal with concerns from players about neutrality?
I don’t see any harm in it. I don’t think it’s going to make any difference. I think people now go along to watch Test cricket and they are waiting for a review to come – it’s a highlight of the day. People are putting pints down. I went last year to watch a game and there was a review. I even put my own pint down and watched the big screen. It’s now part of the game.What did you think the decision was going to be?
I got it wrong. I said it was out. It was missing by a foot. It was one of those things.Did you ever read what people wrote about your performances as an umpire?
I know one or two would read it, but I certainly didn’t. The daftest thing I ever did was write a book, because I didn’t like talking about cricket! There’s enough people around who text you or say, “You’d better go and have a check on Cricinfo.” But I’ve never minded journalists. All I’ve ever said is, say the truth and make it not personal.There’s some brilliant people around writing at the moment and some of it is very, very interesting to read. Some of the stuff – and I’ve been in the game for 40-odd years – some of it I didn’t even think of, and I think that’s well worth reading. But talk to the mental-health people and they say, “Don’t just read it when you’ve had a good day. You’ve got to read it when you’ve had a bad day too.”If you’re an international umpire, the one thing that’s going to tell you one way or the other is a 90ft screen at every ground. You’ve got to put your ego away. And I think this group of modern umpires have thrown it away because they understand DRS. They understand the one that just flicks the glove they’re never going to see. But if [the additional review] makes the game a better place, well, so be it.”You could walk into a restaurant and sit and chat with Kohli for hours. When you look at Virat, you’re thinking male model, pin-up boy, but he knows about the game, the past, history – lovely guy”•Cameron Spencer/Getty ImagesYou write in your book that you were “pretty hostile” towards DRS at the start.
Oh yeah, I kicked the stumps over in a West Indies-Zimbabwe game. Both teams had walked off the field. Straight ball by Dwayne Bravo, hit [Chris] Mpofu on the foot, he’s turned round, limped off. Everyone’s gone back. I’m standing there with my partner. There’s a review just because they had one left. We had to bring them all back.That was in the old days. Talking to Paul Hawkins [inventor of Hawk-Eye] about it – some of the things then weren’t as good as they are now. You can watch it now and there’ll be the odd one you go, “Hmm, wasn’t sure about that”, but a high percentage of it is spot on. I remember being told, “HotSpot can’t work because it’s too sunny, too hot.” What do you mean by that? But that was back in the dark ages. Now you don’t get any of that.Speaking of technology at the outset of DRS: your decision to give Sachin Tendulkar out lbw to Saeed Ajmal during the 2011 World Cup semi-final – subsequently overturned on review – is still subject of debate today.
Don’t go down that road. I get teased about that. People send me pictures of my reaction after I was told in my ear by Billy Bowden that it was missing leg stump. It makes me laugh. It didn’t make me laugh at the time, I can assure you. But I’d give it out again with my back to the wall. It was dead. I don’t know what happened.ALSO READ: Are umpires giving more lbws now than they did before the DRS?Given the level of support they attract, were India the hardest team to officiate?
It’s intimidating. Not the players. The players are outstanding people. I’ve done seven, eight India-Pakistan games and the guys are real good people. They get on with each other. If you allow a crowd to get to you, all that noise and Mexican waves, or whatever, can distract you. Then you start missing bits and pieces and it’s a difficult place to be. But, you know, a couple of lads, last year or two years ago, did Bangladesh-Sri Lanka and there wasn’t one seamer picked in both sides. That would have been pretty difficult.You write that turning pitches were the hardest to umpire on. Did you have to learn to pick spinners’ variations too?
Yeah, you just went to the nets. I think some of the younger generation are missing out on that. They don’t want to go to nets. One good thing about the four English guys is, they go as routine. We’ve always done that and it’s been brilliant. Suddenly there’s a guy making his debut. If you don’t go to the nets, you’re never going to have seen him, so you’re now guessing. I just think it’s a big part of being professional. It’s something we’ve learned from David Constant, David Shepherd, Peter Willey. They set such a high standard. We didn’t want to fall away.

” I’m looking at myself: ‘What you thinking here, Ian, you’ve got six weeks in the Caribbean, in February, when it’s freezing in London.’ I didn’t want to do it”Gould on struggling with mental-health issues

What were the hardest decisions to call on the field?
Left-arm over, pitching outside leg stump. Those are the ones you’ve got to try and get right. You had people like Mitchell Starc – if it was his day, it started off stump and swung – whoa, you knew you were in business. But then when he didn’t quite get his action right, you weren’t sure whether it pitched on or not. Same with Mitchell Johnson.Probably one of the most difficult is the legspinner in the subcontinent where it has pitched in line. But once you got used to Hawk-Eye, with seamers, you knew that with a certain part of the pad, it should be going over the top of the stumps.The ball pitching outside is probably the most disappointing, and the legspinner over the wicket to a right-hander. Has that pitched leg stump? Has it spun too much? Those are the ones that are difficult. If it clips the glove, you’ve got no chance. That’s not a problem. But once you see the ball-tracking on the 90ft screen and it pitches outside, that’s a little hard to take.Did umpires have to change the way they assessed lbw appeals after DRS came in?
Yeah, your mindset changed completely. And you go the other way also, thinking, don’t forget [the stumps] are only nine inches wide and you’ve got umpire’s call on leg stump. There’s probably times you’d give that out in the old days, but you say “not out” now. Come on, Hawk-Eye, prove me right. The standard rate of umpiring under DRS is in the 90s. That is phenomenal. If you went to a racetrack and got 90% of winners, you’d be doing handstands.You write about the importance of relationships with players. Did that come from experience?
If I walk into a pub, someone says hello to me, I say hello back. Don’t turn your back on them. I think that’s crept into the game where maybe one or two umpires are a little bit unsure of a player. The English guys, we go to the nets, we talk, we practise. I was obviously louder and more boisterous than the other three, but people knew who I was, they knew they could go and have a laugh and it would get to a certain level. But they knew when it went past that level, I would come down on them like a ton of bricks. Some very “nice” things were said about me afterwards and that shocked me a little bit, because all I was doing was my job.Virat Kohli was one you often shared a laugh with.
He’s a funny man. Yeah, he batted like me a couple of times. I had to tell him off for slogging it. He’s a charmer. He’s one of those guys who’s got, a bit like Sachin Tendulkar, the whole of India on his back, but you wouldn’t know. You could walk into a restaurant and sit and chat with him for hours. He’s a very worldly boy. When you look at Virat, you’re thinking male model, pin-up boy, but he knows about the game inside out, the past, history. Lovely guy.”The standard rate of umpiring under DRS is in the 90s. That is phenomenal. If you went to a racetrack and got 90% of winners, you’d be doing handstands”•Ryan Pierse/Getty ImagesHe had his run-ins with authority in the past.
I can see why. But he’s learned to be respectful. He could have continued his career like that and people could be talking totally the opposite about Virat. He’s a nice man and the India boys are very, very good people, very respectful.You were the third umpire in Cape Town in 2018 and have said that Australia had gotten out of control in the lead up to the sandpaper episode. What was wrong with their general behaviour?
Laddish. Jack the lads they were. Now they are a completely different team. It’s probably the greatest thing that happened to them. You know, they were going through these pay talks. That would have been grinding people down. But there was only a few of them that were getting a bit hostile and in your face. I have spoken to some of the players and they probably didn’t see it, like me with my mental illness. But if there’s a few of you doing the same things, part of you thinks, “Well, that’s all right.” It just got out of hand.ALSO READ: Umpire suspicions about Australia led to Newlands stingHad you seen anything like players bringing sandpaper on to the field before?
No, not even in my social life. Not even someone stealing food from the tuck shop. I’d love to meet Cameron [Bancroft] again. Justin Langer is good friend of mine. He’s a great bloke, and he says, you’ve just got to meet this kid. I met him for about five minutes [at Newlands]. It was horrible for him. But I’d just like to sit opposite him and have a beer and talk it through. Because he’s got a great story. But I think he won’t be saying it until his career’s finished.A few weeks later in the Caribbean, you were on the scene of another ball-tampering controversy. Dinesh Chandimal denied a charge of altering the condition of the ball – but was later found guilty – and his team refused to take the field on the third morning of the Test. Why did that incident blow up in the way it did?
St Lucia. It was crazy. We tried asking the question. The thing was, Javagal Srinath, a brilliant man and very good referee, spoke to both teams before, concerning what happened in South Africa. Umpires are not going to catch players. Unless you do it right in front of my face, I’m not going to catch you. I’ve said this a million times and people look at me stupidly. But cameramen will catch you, so if you think you’re not going to get caught, I can guarantee you are going to get caught, because one camera will be designated to watch where that ball’s going all the time. I didn’t get why Sri Lanka were so hostile.

“Umpiring is now a young man’s sport. The players are expecting a lot more of you, to be a lot fitter”

You say in the book that Sri Lanka “got away lightly” and that you would have abandoned the Test and awarded it to West Indies.
They disrupted two and a half hours of international cricket. If everybody looked back on that, then I think there would be different decisions made. But that’s life. Those were the decisions made, those sanctions [a one-match ban for Chandimal] were in place at the time. I still can’t get my head around why they were so hostile. The manager and the coach were as hostile as I can remember. Dinesh Chandimal I knew reasonably well, but they started to say he doesn’t speak good English. Well, we did well not to giggle because we’d just listened to a post-match interview that he’d done in broad, fantastic English. I just think that if we went back on that, a lot of things would have been done differently.One other high-profile umpiring incident of recent times came during the World Cup final, when Ben Stokes deflected Martin Guptill’s throw to the boundary and was awarded six runs. Did you know the exact wording of the law on overthrows?
I’d be lying to say that I knew that. I had no idea. I know about the law, but the problem is that you’re looking at getting into position for prospective run-outs. Rod Tucker was third umpire and I don’t think he would have had enough time to be thinking that way. Thank god I wasn’t there. I was sitting on Brighton beach watching it. It all blew up later in the evening. Just some clever clogs went through a law book and it all came out.I think it was unfair. At the end of it, it’s going to be hard work trying to sort that all out. It’s split-second, and it’s a World Cup final as well. I should imagine the fourth umpire was scrambling around trying to find the balls that would be bowled [in the Super Over]. I can only imagine it.That World Cup was your last involvement as an international umpire. Do you miss it?
I miss the buzz. God, I miss the buzz. It was great fun. I just met some fantastic people, and I was so, so damn lucky to meet these people, and they were so kind, I’m just very grateful.Since you were in possession of the best seat in the house, who were the three best batsmen to watch during your time?
Jacques Kallis. I loved watching Jacques. He was a very, very fine player. Sachin. And probably Virat. I was unlucky in some respects. I didn’t see the best of Ricky Ponting. He was an outstanding character, outstanding captain, such a proud Australian. But his career was just starting to wane as I came on the scene. But he was incredibly helpful, so I’m disappointed I have to leave him out. Jacques Kallis, I could sit and watch all day, Virat, the same. And Sachin, if you want someone to bat for your life, he was the man.Within the space of three months in 2018, Gould was involved in two Tests that were overshadowed by ball-tampering incidents, in Cape Town by Australia and in St Lucia by Sri Lanka•Randy Brooks/AFP/Getty ImagesAnd bowlers?
Mitchell Starc on his day. Mitchell Johnson on his day. He bowled some very, very quick balls. And probably the one who gave me the biggest heart attack throughout my years – Saeed Ajmal. Lovely man, but he bowled all sorts of balls. On wickets that spun – I think Saeed would tell you he wasn’t the biggest spinner of a ball, but when you could get it going both ways, that’s tough. So Saeed, yeah, he was a very fine bowler, very clever bowler.What was the best batsman-bowler duel that you stood for?
Steyn versus Tendulkar, Cape Town. That was fierce but fair. That was as good as it got. I was stood there with a brilliant umpire, Simon Taufel, and the two of us came off and said, “Wow, we’d pay for that.” Dale bowled very quickly and Sachin just had the railway sleeper in his hand and kept patting it back at him. Fantastic.Is umpiring something you would recommend to younger people take an interest in?
The job’s changed completely. I was talking to someone yesterday, about an old photo of Frank Chester – he had a trilby on, coat down to his ankles, and a pair of brogues. All he needed to do was take off his umpire’s coat, put on a blazer and go straight to the pub. He didn’t need to change.I think the more people get to read books like mine, listen to podcasts with Richard Illingworth and Richard Kettleborough, and what’s written by the press – umpiring’s a very good job now. It can be exciting, exhilarating. I found umpiring, the day went quicker than playing, because you’re always doing something. It is a worthwhile occupation. At the ECB, we’ve got James Tredwell and James Middlesbrook, both ex-players, coming through at the right age. Because it is now a young man’s sport. The players are expecting a lot more of you, to be a lot fitter. It’s not the sort of job [where you can] play county cricket till you’re 42 and think, “Do you know what, I’ll go and do a bit of umpiring.” You’d have missed ten years of fun. On my behalf it’s a must, something that people should really look into.

فيليبي لويس يتغزل في بيراميدز: سيطروا على أحد أفضل فرق السعودية.. ولسنا المرشحين للفوز

تحدث فيليبي لويس، المدير الفني لفريق فلامنجو البرازيلي، عن مباراة بيراميدز المصري المرتقبة في بطولة كأس إنتركونتيننتال، مساء يوم السبت، في قطر.

ويواجه فلامنجو خصمه فريق بيراميدز، مساء يوم السبت، في نصف نهائي بطولة كأس إنتركونتيننتال نسخة 2025، في الدوحة.

وقال فيليبي لويس، في تصريحات نشرتها صحيفة “uol” البرازيلية: “لقد تركنا انطباعًا جيدًا في عالم كرة القدم، لكن ليس في البرازيل، بالنسبة للعالم ترك فلامنجو انطباعًا جيدًا، لكن للأسف، في البرازيل لا تُهم إلا النتائج”.

وأضاف: “لويس إنريكي لا يرغب في مواجهة فلامنجو، وفلامنجو لا يرغب في مواجهة باريس سان جيرمان أيضًا، لكن لن تتاح لهم فرصة خوض مباراة نصف النهائي للمجازفة، لقد رسم إنريكي أجمل لوحة في عالم كرة القدم، وهي باريس سان جيرمان الخاص به”.

وواصل: “باريس سان جيرمان فريق فريد من نوعه، من الصعب جدًا تقليده نظرًا لخصوصياته، لا يسعك إلا الإعجاب به، مباراة بيراميدز؟ كان مايلي اللاعب المحوري لديهم في مباراة أهلي جدة، وربما اللاعب الأكثر حسمًا في مباراة بيراميدز، لكنه فريق متماسك للغاية ولا يقتصر على هذا اللاعب فقط”.

وشدد: “يتميز دفاعهم بتطوره الكبير، إذ يمتلكون مدربًا يفهم هذا الجانب الدفاعي جيدًا، من خلال تحليلي، إنه فريق يدافع ببراعة ويفهم التغطية وخطوط الرقابة جيدًا”.

اقرأ أيضًا.. يورتشيتش: نشعر بالفخر في بيراميدز.. ونطلب بعض التقدير

واسترسل: “الأهلي السعودي هو أحد أفضل الفرق تنظيمًا في السعودية، عانى كثيرًا لاختراق دفاعهم المحكم، علينا أن نكون في مواقع تكتيكية ممتازة على أرض الملعب، لكن الأهم هو أن يكون اللاعبون مبدعين وجريئين في هذه المباراة”.

وعندما سُئل عما كان من العدل أن يلعب الفريق الأوروبي في النهائي فقط، قال: “ليس من العدل، لكنني لن أكون من يشتكي من هذه الفرصة الرائعة للمشاركة في إنتركونتيننتال والتنافس ضد هذه الفرق العظيمة، لكننا نعلم أن الفريق الأوروبي لا يواجه خطر الخروج من نصف النهائي، ولا يعاني من الإرهاق الذي قد نعانيه في النهائي”.

وأكد: “لكن في الوقت نفسه، إنه لشرف عظيم أن نتنافس في هذه البطولة، مهما كان نظامها، لذلك، سنستمتع بهذه الفرصة قدر الإمكان”.

وما إذا كان يشعر بأنه المرشح للفوز، قال: “لا أعرف إن كان هذا عيبًا فيّ أم لا، لكنني لا أشعر أبدًا بأنني المرشح للفوز كمدرب، أشعر دائمًا بالقلق، وأرى الفريق المنافس كأفضل فريق في العالم، وأرى فيه الكثير من الإيجابيات”.

واستأنف: “أعتقد أن مباراة الغد ستكون صعبة للغاية بناءً على ما حللته وشاهدته، أتوقع ذلك، لقد سبق وأن خاضوا مباريات سيئة من قبل أيضًا، لكنها قليلة جدًا، لم يخسروا سوى مباراة أو اثنتين منذ أغسطس”.

واختتم: “إنه فريق معتاد على الفوز والمنافسة، لا أشعر بأنني المرشح للفوز على الإطلاق، أعلم أن لدي أفضل اللاعبين، لكنني لا أشعر بأنني المرشح للفوز”.

Arne Slot confirms planned talks with Mo Salah over potential return after week of mutiny

Arne Slot has confirmed that he will be holding talks with Mohamed Salah at the end of a mutinous week at Liverpool, but has stopped short of announcing whether or not the Egyptian forward has a role to play in the Reds’ Premier League clash with Brighton. Salah was dropped for a Champions League trip to Inter after speaking out against the club.

What Salah said in explosive outburst against Liverpool & Slot

Two-time title winner Salah, who has spent eight memorable years on Merseyside, has not taken kindly to seeing bench duty across three consecutive top-flight fixtures. He saw no game time as Liverpool were held to a dramatic 3-3 draw away at Leeds.

Speaking to reporters after that contest at Elland Road, as his restricted role and working relationship with Slot were addressed, Salah said: "Now I'm sitting on the bench and I don't know why. It seems like the club has thrown me under the bus. That's how I am feeling. I think it is very clear that someone wanted me to get all of the blame. I got a lot of promises in the summer and so far I am in the bench for three games so I can't say they keep the promise.

"I said many times before that I had a good relationship with the manager and all of a sudden, we don't have any relationship. I don't know why, but it seems to me, how I see it, that someone doesn't want me in the club."

AdvertisementGOAL Private talks: Slot to sit down with frustrated Salah

Having faced plenty of criticism for airing his grievances in public, Salah was subsequently left out of a 1-0 victory over Inter at San Siro in elite European competition. He will be heading off on Africa Cup of Nations duty once a meeting with Brighton is taken in on Saturday.

Quizzed on whether Salah will be involved against the Seagulls, Dutch tactician Slot said of collective plans at Anfield: "What I need is a conversation with him and the next time I speak about Mo should be with him and not in here. There's not much more I can say. I speak to him today and the outcome determines how things will look tomorrow.

"You can try (the question) in multiple ways but I said the next time I speak about him should be with him. I think there's been a lot of conversation since last week between his representatives and ours."

Asked if Salah needs to say sorry to anyone that he has offended, Slot added: "An apology? Normally I'd say you've had your three questions!"

Do Liverpool want Salah to say? Slot answers future question

Liverpool’s manager went on to say when quizzed again on his talismanic No.11 and whether the 250-goal forward has a long-term future with the Reds: "Who made the call (to leave Salah out of squad for Inter)? I think we decided as a club and I was part of that not to take him to Inter. I am always in contact with them with line up and squads, that is always left to me. I talk to Richard Hughes more than Michael Edwards, we speak about many things.

"Do I want him to stay? Another way of asking but the next time I speak about Mo will be with him. I have no reasons not to want him to stay."

ENJOYED THIS STORY?

Add GOAL.com as a preferred source on Google to see more of our reporting

Getty ImagesTransfer rumours: Salah linked with Saudi Pro League clubs

Salah only committed to a two-year contract extension with Liverpool back in April, with the reigning PFA Player of the Year intended to remain on Merseyside through to the summer of 2027 – taking him to a decade of service with the Reds.

Serious questions are now being asked of whether that deal will be honoured, with big-spending teams in the Saudi Pro League reportedly ready to test the Reds’ resolve when another transfer window swings open in January. If Salah really does feel as though he is being forced out, as he becomes a supposed scapegoat for struggles in 2025-26, then the 33-year-old will likely open himself up to discussions with interested parties.

The Rondo, Conference Finals review: Lionel Messi’s Inter Miami look destined for MLS Cup, Thomas Muller’s Whitecaps keep rising, and Hirving ‘Chucky’ Lozano’s San Diego future grows unclear

Lionel Messi and Thomas Müller strolled into the final, but the semifinals still left us plenty to unpack – including fresh questions about Hirving ‘Chucky’ Lozano’s future in San Diego.

And just like that, the stage is set. The Vancouver Whitecaps and Inter Miami will play for the MLS Cup on Saturday afternoon. That’s a tasty one: Lionel Messi on one side, Thomas Müller on the other, two legends anchoring two genuinely strong teams gearing up for a proper final.

But what about the games that got them here? MLS delivered two highly watchable – if not particularly close – semis over the weekend. Miami battered NYCFC, 5-1. Vancouver saw off San Diego 3-1. The results were perhaps a little predictable. But the margin of victory for both games? Not a chance. Still, it sets things up pincely – and does provide a forum for reflection. NYCFC were underdogs, and actually made a decent account of themselves in the game. SDFC could have played Vancouver even, but a couple of rough breaks – and the fact that they dealt with the reported internal turmoil of strife between their head coach, Mikey Varas, and their star player in Hirving 'Chucky' Lozano – made things trickier. 

Still, are the results fair? And is this the dream final? GOAL U.S. writers take a look at a fun weekend of conference finals, and look ahead to what should be a captivating MLS Cup in another edition of… . 

Getty Images SportWhich was the more convincing win: Miami or Vancouver?

Tom Hindle: Miami, no question. That was probably the most dominant performance have turned in all season. Messi didn't have his best game whatsoever, and they still battered an opponent in NYCFC that has been in excellent form of late. Five goals, one real chance conceded, and they look in their best form heading into the biggest game of the year. 

Ryan Tolmich: Both impressive and both, in a way, somewhat expected. Miami and Vancouver are both so far ahead of the teams they beat, which is what makes this such a fun MLS Cup final. As for the more convincing, it's probably Miami, largely because it was just the perfect reminder that they can light up a team unlike any other in MLS history.

AdvertisementGetty Images SportWhat do San Diego and NYCFC need to do this offseason to go a step further?

TH: San Diego got almost everything right. Perhaps the only thing that derailed things a bit was a bit of defensive frailty that Vancouver exposed. So, yeah, avoid injury, maybe bring in a little center back, and they're contenders next year. As for NYCFC, things look a little trickier. Can Maxi Moralez be counted on to stick around longer? Is Alonzo Martinez going to play any part next season? They need to invest in the attack to get close to where they were this year – even if manager Pascal Jansen did a fine job. 

RT: San Diego will be looking at all of this and wondering "what if?". They had a star striker in Milan Iloski, but now he's in Philly because they were unable to keep him permanently. If they had him, would the outcome change? Maybe not, but it surely would have helped. As for NYCFC, they're close. The big task this offseason will likely be sorting out striker and midfield additions following crucial injuries. If they can do that, they'll be fine.

Getty Images SportDoes Chucky Lozano have a long-term future in SDFC?

TH: If he behaves, yes! The Mexican star was supposedly in, shall we say, disagreement with Mikey Varas on a few occasions this year. If that relationship is properly mended, then they should be able to run things back in 2026. But disgruntled superstars can be a real issue, and with Anders Dreyer around, Chucky might not be the go-to guy, anyway. 

RT: It's looking rocky, at the very least. He wasn't quite the elite presence many would have expected and, towards the end of the season, there was a clash with the coaching staff. Because of that, it's fair to at least wonder if this partnership is one that's going to work in the long run. If it doesn't, Lozano will have options. San Diego will, too, and they've shown a real ability to scout and sign talent. Lozano or no Lozano, one would bet on the club making the right call based on just this one year of evidence.

ENJOYED THIS STORY?

Add GOAL.com as a preferred source on Google to see more of our reporting

Getty Images SportIs it fair to say that Miami are now a good defensive team?

TH: Not really. A couple of defensive good games doesn't make them unreal at the back. But they certainly have found a vital sense of balance from front to back. Let's see if they can keep a good Vancouver team quiet, and then let's talk.

RT: Let's not get carried away! This team still has its frailties, and the path to an MLS Cup is likely outscoring the Whitecaps, not shutting them down. Are they passable defensively? Sure, but no one is mistaking them for some shutdown side. Ultimately, this is a group that defends via its attack, which should scare any opponent into being just a little bit more cautious, given the talent on the field.

Man City player ratings vs Newcastle: Phil Foden’s costly miss hurts City’s Premier League title hopes as Erling Haaland shows he’s human

Phil Foden and Erling Haaland each missed a pair of sitters as Manchester City fell to a 2-1 defeat at Newcastle United which threatens to derail their Premier League title charge. City's two big-game players froze at St James' Park and Harvey Barnes grabbed the headlines instead, giving Newcastle the lead and then snatching the winner after Ruben Dias' deflected equaliser.

The first half witnessed the highest amount of 'Big Chances' created in the league this season and it felt like a competition to determine who could miss the most glaring opportunities. Haaland dinked the ball wide after a wonderful through ball from Jeremy Doku and then aimed straight at Nick Pope after a cut-back from Nico O'Reilly. Foden missed an even better opportunity when he fired wide of the far post after playing a one-two with Rayan Cherki. Newcastle were equally guilty of wastefulness. Nick Woltemade sent a shot and a header too close to Gianluigi Donnarumma. Barnes had the reddest face of all, though, somehow missing the target from point-blank range when meeting a sweeping ball across the box.

City had two penalty appeals turned down, first when Foden fell from a tackle by Fabian Schar – albeit after getting his shot away – and then when a Doku shot hit the arm of Malick Thiaw.

The second half was less frenetic but it delivered on the goals front. Barnes compensated for his glaring miss by nailing the ball into the bottom corner to put Newcastle in front in the 64th minute. The Magpies' joy did not last long as Dias pulled a goal back for City with the help of a big deflection off Schar, but Newcastle came straight back at Pep Guardiola's side, capitalising on some poor goalkeeping from Donnarumma to bundle the ball in after Bruno Guimaraes had headed against the bar.

The goal was given after a long VAR check for offside, meaning City had eight minutes of additional time to find their way back. But it was no use and they had to digest a fourth defeat in just 12 Premier League games, handing a massive advantage in the title race to Arsenal, one day before the north London derby.

GOAL rates Man City's players from St James' Park…

  • Getty Images Sport

    Goalkeeper & Defence

    Gianluigi Donnarumma (5/10):

    Played with fire when his short pass to Foden in the first minute was intercepted then did well to get his body in front of the three Woltemade efforts. There was nothing he could do to stop Barnes' arrow although he made a mess of the two crosses leading to the second.

    Matheus Nunes (5/10):

    Struggled to handle Barnes for much of the game. Had a good first-half from an attacking point of view although his threat faded.

    Ruben Dias (6/10):

    Couldn't stop the move leading to the opener although it wasn't a big error. Got lucky with the equaliser.

    Josko Gvardiol (5/10):

    Made a brilliant goal-line clearance just before the second goal. Despite that, he struggled to contain many of Newcastle's breaks.

    Nico O'Reilly (6/10):

    Good going forward although his botched clearance led to Newcastle breaking the deadlock.

  • Advertisement

  • Getty Images Sport

    Midfield

    Bernardo Silva (5/10):

    Didn't give Gonzalez enough support when doubling up with him in holding midfield and didn't manage to control the game with possession.

    Nico Gonzalez (5/10):

    His good run of form vanished as he was overwhelmed in midfield.

    Phil Foden (4/10):

    Uncharacteristically sloppy in front of goal. He normally buries both of the efforts that came his way, especially the one in the first half which opened up perfectly for him.

  • Getty Images Sport

    Attack

    Rayan Cherki (5/10):

    Had a couple of nice moments such as setting up Foden and keeping the move alive for the equaliser but overall didn't get too involved in the game.

    Erling Haaland (4/10):

    A bad day at the office, perhaps feeling the effects of firing Norway to the World Cup. Couldn't get his 100th Premier League goal despite having three chances, two of them you would normally back him to score.

    Jeremy Doku (7/10):

    The one City player who could be pleased with their performance. Created lots of danger in the first half and on another day would have won a penalty for handball.

  • ENJOYED THIS STORY?

    Add GOAL.com as a preferred source on Google to see more of our reporting

  • Getty Images Sport

    Subs & Manager

    Savinho (5/10):

    Lashed a wild shot over and wide when he should have hit the target.

    Tijjani Reijnders (6/10):

    Gave City more urgency going forward.

    Oscar Bobb (5/10):

    No magic moment like his winner in 2024 as he struggled to get into the game.

    Omar Marmoush (N/A):

    Replaced Foden in the 87th minute.

    Pep Guardiola (5/10):

    Has to be disappointed with how open his side were, conceding a hatful of chances even before the goals arrived. And all the momentum from the Liverpool win is gone.

'They're always telling me to shoot' – Keira Walsh prefers setting up goals to scoring them but Chelsea star has changed 'mindset' under pressure from team-mates and coach Sonia Bompastor

Chelsea star Keira Walsh claimed that she loves to set up goals more than scoring them but she has changed her 'mindset' under pressure from team-mates and manager Sonia Bompastor. After spending two-and-a-half seasons at European giants Barcelona, the English midfielder returned to her home in February 2025 as the Women's Super League winners signed her.

  • Shift in Walsh's position in new season

    Walsh, who is one of the best defensive midfielders in the world at the moment, operated in a deep role after signing for the Blues earlier this year. However, since the start of the 2025-26 campaign, Walsh has been deployed in a more advanced position, which is allowing her to contribute more to the team's attack. The change in position also helped her score her first-ever Chelsea goal last month as Walsh's solitary strike helped her club beat Tottenham Hotspur 1-0.

    In the seven Women's Super League matches Walsh played last season, she had only one shot on goal. Compared to that, in the eight matches she has played this season, the midfielder already has 14 shots to her name. 

  • Advertisement

  • Getty Images Sport

    'I've always preferred playing the assist'

    Speaking to , Walsh opened up on her change of role, revealing that her team-mates and coaches have played a role in her development. 

    "It's maybe not position and playing further forward, but Sonia and Cami [Abily, Chelsea's assistant manager] are always telling me to shoot, and it was the same when I played at Barca," she said. "The girls were always encouraging me. For myself, I've always preferred playing the assist or the assist before the assist. That's something that I've always liked doing.

    "It was about me changing my mindset a little bit and still trying to help the team in that respect – maybe it is taking a shot more, and sometimes I was probably overplaying a little bit. It's feeling more confident, and Sonia and Cami really encouraged me to do that. Not a lot of central defensive midfielders do, apart from [Moises] Caicedo. The way I play defensive midfield it is more about breaking lines and trying to break presses, and contributing a little bit more in attack. I'm not known for my big tackles, although I am working on that. When it opens up, Sonia's encouraged me to take the ball forward, and if I feel like a shot is on, then it's being free to do that."

  • Walsh aiming 'to be in the right place at the right time'

    Walsh added: "In the position I play, a lot of it will be on the second phase or drop-downs, and maybe from set-pieces with the drop-downs there as well. It's trying to be in the right place at the right time. I'm not as good as Sam Kerr at that, but recently, I feel like I've been lucky with where the ball has landed and opened up for a shot. Previously, I would have tried to make a pass in the box, and with a lot of bodies around, it's not ideal. Cami is always going on at me to shoot, whether it's right foot or left foot. The left foot's not so great, so I try not to do that too much."

  • ENJOYED THIS STORY?

    Add GOAL.com as a preferred source on Google to see more of our reporting

  • Getty Images Sport

    Injury blow for Chelsea ahead of Liverpool

    Blues boss Bompastor has confirmed that star goalkeeper Hannah Hampton has been ruled out of action for a few weeks due to a quad injury. Speaking ahead of Chelsea's clash against Liverpool on Sunday, the manager said: "Hannah won't be here. She picked up a quad injury. She will be out for a few weeks. We'll see if we see her before the end of the year but I'm not sure. It could be the case, yes."

Walk-Off Wagers: MLB Best Bets Today (Mets Clinch, Dodgers and Padres bats stay hot)

Happy Hump Day! It’s time to bet on some playoff baseball. 

We are on a 4-0 streak this week, let’s see if we can keep it rolling. 

There are two potential elimination games today, as the Mets and Padres look to close it out at home.   

Best MLB Bets Today

  • Mets ML (-112)
  • Dodgers/Padres over 7.4 (-120)

Phillies vs. Mets Prediction

Jose Quintana starts at home tonight for the Mets.   The Phillies are typically dominant vs. left-handed pitching, but in his last outing vs. the Phillies, Quintana spun a seven-inning gem, allowing just three hits and no earned runs.  Across three games pitched this season vs. Philadelphia, Quintana has a 2.81 ERA. 

Ranger Suarez starts for the Phillies. Suarez has an ERA of 5.65 since the All-Star Break, allowing 15 earned runs across 22 ⅓ innings pitched in September. He’s making his first MLB start since September 27.  Suarez pitched well in his last outing vs. the Mets in September, allowing two earned runs across five innings pitched.   The Phillies will be ready to go to their bullpen immediately if Suarez struggles in an elimination game.

Phillies relievers have allowed 12 earned runs across just nine innings pitched in the postseason. 

Mets hitters have averaged 5.67 runs per game in the postseason, second only to the Phillies, and they are coming off a 7-2 win vs. the Phillies yesterday.

It’s hard to bet against a 95-win team with a +113 run differential in the regular season, but the postseason is a new ballgame.  

The Mets are hungrier. 

Dodgers vs. Padres Prediction

The rivalry is heating up, and the Padres have a chance to close it out at home Wednesday night. 

The Dodgers will start a bullpen game and have yet to name an opener.  The Dodgers bullpen has allowed six earned runs across 12 ⅔ innings pitched to the Padres in the postseason.  The Padres are averaging a postseason-leading six runs per game. 

The Padres will start Dylan Cease tonight on short rest.  Cease allowed five runs over just 3 ⅓ innings in Game 1 of this series, including a three-run home run shot to Shohei Ohtani.

The Dodgers are averaging the third-most runs per game in the postseason (4.67).

Both managers will have a short leash tonight, but I’ll bet on the bats to be hotter tonight. 

Game
Register
Service
Bonus