All the MLB History Yoshinobu Yamamoto Made With Complete Game in Dodgers’ Game 2 Win

Entering the Dodgers’ postseason run this fall, right-handed ace Yoshinobu Yamamoto didn’t have a single complete game on his résumé.

He now has two. And they’ve come in his last two outings, nonetheless.

To follow up his nine-inning gem in Los Angeles’s NLCS win on Oct. 14, Yamamoto dialed up another complete game Saturday night to lead the Dodgers to a 5–1 victory over the Blue Jays in Game 2 of the World Series. In nine innings of work, Yamamoto allowed just one run on four hits with eight strikeouts. He only got better as the game went on, striking out the side in the eighth inning and retiring 20 consecutive hitters to end the game.

In four starts this postseason, Yamamoto has logged a 1.57 ERA and 0.73 WHIP with 26 strikeouts in 28 2/3 innings. He’s just the second player in MLB history to notch his first two complete games in the playoffs, joining Josh Beckett in 2003.

“He’s pitched in big ball games in Japan. He’s pitched in the [World Baseball Classic]. Players who have the weight of a country on their shoulders, that’s pressure,” Dodgers manager Dave Roberts said of Yamamoto after Game 2. “I just feel that part of his DNA is to just perform at a high level in big spots. Control his heart beat and just continue to make pitches. He could’ve went another 30, 40 pitches tonight.”

Yamamoto became the first pitcher to throw a complete game in the World Series since Royals righthander Johnny Cueto in 2015. Only 11 pitchers have done so in a World Series game dating back to 1990, and just six pitchers have gone the distance this century.

Pitchers to throw complete games in the World Series (since 1990)

PLAYER (TEAM)

DATE

STATS

RESULT

Yoshinobu Yamamoto (Dodgers)

Oct. 25, 2025

9 IP, 4 H, 1 ER, 8 K

W, 5–1

Johnny Cueto (Royals)

Oct. 28, 2015

9 IP, 2 H, 1 ER, 4 K

W, 7–1

Madison Bumgarner (Giants)

Oct. 26, 2014

9 IP, 4 H, 0 ER, 8 K

W, 5–0

Cliff Lee (Phillies)

Oct. 28, 2009

9 IP, 6 H, 1 R, 10 K

W, 6–1

Josh Beckett (Marlins)

Oct. 25, 2003

9 IP, 5 H, 0 ER, 9 K

W, 2–0

Randy Johnson (Diamondbacks)

Oct. 28, 2001

9 IP, 3 H, 0 ER, 11 K

W, 4–0

Greg Maddux (Braves)

Oct. 21, 1995

9 IP, 2 H, 2 R, 4 K

W, 3–2

Curt Schilling (Phillies)

Oct. 21, 1993

9 IP, 5 H, 0 ER, 6 K

W, 2–0

Tom Glavine (Braves)

Oct. 17, 1992

9 IP, 4 H, 1 ER, 6 K

W, 3–1

Jack Morris (Twins)

Oct. 27, 1991

10 IP, 7 H, 0 ER, 8 K

W, 1–0

Dave Stewart (A’s)

Oct. 20, 1990

9 IP, 7 H, 1 ER, 2 K

L, 2–1

He’s also the first pitcher to log back-to-back complete games in a single postseason since Diamondbacks ace Curt Schilling in 2001. Schilling actually posted three straight complete games in Arizona’s ‘01 playoff run, going the distance in two games in the NLDS and another in the NLCS.

Pitchers to throw back-to-back complete games in a single postseason (since 1990)

PLAYER (TEAM)

YEAR

STREAK OF CG

Curt Schilling (Diamondbacks)

2001

3

Yoshinobu Yamamoto (Dodgers)

2025

2

Tom Glavine (Braves)

1992

2

Tim Wakefield (Pirates)

1992

2

If that was Yamamoto’s final start of the year, what a way to go out. But if it wasn’t, and the Dodgers are planning to call his number again later in the World Series, it’s only fair to expect greatness from the 27-year-old ace.

Ian Gould: 'Modern umpires have thrown away their egos because they understand DRS'

The former international umpire looks back at his career: the Ajmal lbw decision in the 2011 World Cup, two ball-tampering scandals, watching Steyn v Tendulkar, and more

Interview by Alan Gardner30-May-2020Ian Gould retired from the ICC’s panel of elite umpires in 2019, after standing in more than 250 international matches over a 13-year career. He has since written a book, My Life in Cricket, covering his time as a player for Middlesex, Sussex and England, his subsequent spell as a coach, and then the switch to umpiring. While on one of his regular walks along Hove seafront, he spoke about his experiences as an umpire, the importance of building relationships along the way, and his hopes for the season to come.You were set to be returning as an umpire on the county circuit this summer – but that must all be up in the air now?
I love umpiring. I really enjoy it and I owe it to the ECB because I’ve had 13-14 years swanning around the world and they’ve been looking after me. So I felt I deserved to come back and show my mettle that I want to carry on. Because whatever people talk about the Hundred, over the years I’ve been in the game, I’ve seen the 60-over game, the 50-over game, the 40-over game, and I remember doing the first T20 game at Bristol, and everyone said, “Well, this is just pub cricket.” Now we look back on that. It’s moved on very, very quickly.I was actually really looking forward to it [the Hundred] and I feel very sorry for the boys at the ECB that took some flak leading up to it. Now it’s wait until next year, but I’m sure it will take off.But you’re still keen to continue?
Oh yeah, without a doubt. I finished [as an international umpire] on July 6 and there was a big come-down. But then I went back to county cricket in the first week of August and I thought, hang on, I really do love this job and I really love the people involved in it. And it got me going again, so I’m not going to be sitting on me backside. I’m preparing for some cricket in late July. Whether that happens or not is two different matters.ALSO READ: Ian ‘Gunner’ Gould whistles his way into the sunsetDue to the Covid-19 situation, the ICC has signalled a “short-term” move to using local umpires in international cricket. Does that mean you could make a comeback, if the ECB succeeds in its plan to stage matches?
We’ve been warned it could happen. I think they’ll be looking at younger people than me. But I’d love to do that again. It was a proper stage and I thoroughly enjoyed it.But we’ve got a great group coming through. We’ve got the four boys [from England] at the elites – been strengthened now by Michael Gough replacing me. Michael is just going through the roof with his umpiring, and so are the other boys. Richard Illingworth, umpire of the year, Richard Kettleborough, three-times winner, Nigel Llong, very steady. I think they have appointed Martin Saggers, David Millns and Michael Burns, so if we do play any international cricket here, the game’s in real good hands.

“Umpires are not going to catch players [tampering with the ball]. Unless you do it right in front of my face, I’m not going to catch you. But cameramen will catch you”

In your book, you say that increased use of technology might lead to the end of neutral umpires. Do you think the ICC should look to make this a permanent change?
I have started to believe, probably in my last two years, that it might go down that road. Though I think the players would like it to stay neutral – that when everyone can travel again, we go back to where it was.I was lucky enough to go to the Under-19 World Cup this year, and I saw some outstanding umpires coming through. That was also at the same time as the Women’s T20 World Cup, so there’s another group of 12 there. The only difference will be that the guys that are here now have had 60-70 Test matches. Some of those other guys have maybe done two Test matches and 20 ODIs. But quite a number of those do the IPL with 80,000 screaming at you.I don’t think it’ll be a major problem, but the way the players are talking, from what I understand, they want to go back to how it was. I think there’s a fear factor. [The players] don’t know these other guys. People are saying there’s not four in South Africa. There are. There’s not four in Bangladesh. There are.I think they are talking now about six Test matches in nine weeks [as part of England’s reworked schedule], plus a few ODIs? So the four elite who are likely to do it, plus the three other lads, are going to have to be in lockdown for probably nine weeks. That is going to turn you stir-crazy.That also seems to be an argument for increasing the pool of eligible umpires.
The other side of it, not even in lockdown, was, we always thought it was a little unfair there was three Aussies and four English on the panel. It left five [who could officiate] when an Ashes series came, which is a massive series. I think three or four of those have done five or six [Ashes] series. Marais Erasmus, Aleem [Dar], Kumar [Dharmasena]. At the end of it, there’s just five of them. That makes it very, very difficult.I think the best umpires should umpire the biggest games. Whether it’s an Englishman at one end, say Richard Kettleborough, and Bruce Oxenford at the other end, or Rob Tucker, whatever way you want… because DRS now is not letting you go. If you’re making a mistake, you’re making a mistake. The only worry I think the boys would have is when you’ve got umpire’s call. You know, you can give an umpire’s call to England if you’re a Pom and not give it to Australia.You don’t want it going back to people saying, oh, this is biased. You can’t have that.Gould, a keeper-batsman, played 18 ODIs for England. Here, he bats against New South Wales in a tour game in 1982-83•Stuart William Macgladrie/Fairfax Media/Getty ImagesYou’ve written about the episode of burnout you suffered in 2016, in part due to the amount of travel and time away from home. Is that something the ICC should be taking into account?
I think it is. It was a very difficult time for me, and I pray that I don’t see [it happen to] anybody, but I do believe there’s been one or two that have not been their normal self. And there’s always this fear of [showing] weakness – “You shouldn’t be talking about this.”I’m listening to young Dominic Bess now. He’s a very bright, nice kid. And he’s openly saying: don’t have a fear of talking to people. If I bump into someone now, I say, “Are you are you okay? Look, mate, I’ve got an hour. Come on, let’s chat it out.” Whereas a year ago, I don’t think I would have said that.Putting your passport in the fridge after returning home was a sign to you that something was wrong. But how long did it take to confront the issue and talk about it?
Six weeks, eight weeks, maybe longer. Once I got on the field, I was integrated with some great players and really fantastic people. But it’s when you went back to your hotel room and you just thought, “Well, what am I doing?” Or a car comes to pick you up to take you to the airport. “Why am I doing this?'”ALSO READ: Which umpire fares the best when reviewed by DRS?I was going for a trip to the West Indies. St Lucia, Barbados, and somewhere else, somewhere beautiful. And I didn’t want to go. I’m looking at myself: “What you thinking here, Ian, you’ve got six weeks in the Caribbean. In February, when it’s freezing in London.” I didn’t want to do it. But once I got on that flight and got there, it was a different story.I was walking down through Hove and I was jumping into shops to avoid people. I didn’t want to hold a conversation because I knew someone would look at me and go, “What’s your problem?”I listened to Marcus Trescothick on a podcast talking about it. I spoke to Michael Yardy about it. Suddenly I was talking to people about it, and it was like, well, that’s me. The awareness now is much greater. We’re lucky that we have the ECB, who were outstanding when I sort of blurted it out. Chris Kelly [the ECB’s umpires’ manager] was unbelievable. He rang me every other day. Dennis Burns, my coach at the ICC, people that I really trust, just rang me and rang me and talked and talked, recommended books I should read and told me to stop drinking like a lunatic.

“I think the best umpires should umpire the biggest games, because DRS now is not letting you go. If you’re making a mistake, you’re making a mistake”

On the subject of scrapping neutral umpires, you would presumably have loved to umpire an Ashes Test?
I was speaking to Richard Kettleborough about it. Richard’s very quiet about things, but when we started talking, you could hear that little bit of joy in his voice. You could almost hear his mind ticking. “Well, how great would that be?” Immense amount of pressure, but he can turn around and say, “Look, I umpired a Test against Australia at Lord’s” – or Birmingham, or wherever.We’re lucky because we’ve got so much county cricket to gain experience, and that’s the biggest thing within the group now at ECB and international, is habit. England, April 1, the season starts and you just get in that routine.What do you think about adding an extra review, to deal with concerns from players about neutrality?
I don’t see any harm in it. I don’t think it’s going to make any difference. I think people now go along to watch Test cricket and they are waiting for a review to come – it’s a highlight of the day. People are putting pints down. I went last year to watch a game and there was a review. I even put my own pint down and watched the big screen. It’s now part of the game.What did you think the decision was going to be?
I got it wrong. I said it was out. It was missing by a foot. It was one of those things.Did you ever read what people wrote about your performances as an umpire?
I know one or two would read it, but I certainly didn’t. The daftest thing I ever did was write a book, because I didn’t like talking about cricket! There’s enough people around who text you or say, “You’d better go and have a check on Cricinfo.” But I’ve never minded journalists. All I’ve ever said is, say the truth and make it not personal.There’s some brilliant people around writing at the moment and some of it is very, very interesting to read. Some of the stuff – and I’ve been in the game for 40-odd years – some of it I didn’t even think of, and I think that’s well worth reading. But talk to the mental-health people and they say, “Don’t just read it when you’ve had a good day. You’ve got to read it when you’ve had a bad day too.”If you’re an international umpire, the one thing that’s going to tell you one way or the other is a 90ft screen at every ground. You’ve got to put your ego away. And I think this group of modern umpires have thrown it away because they understand DRS. They understand the one that just flicks the glove they’re never going to see. But if [the additional review] makes the game a better place, well, so be it.”You could walk into a restaurant and sit and chat with Kohli for hours. When you look at Virat, you’re thinking male model, pin-up boy, but he knows about the game, the past, history – lovely guy”•Cameron Spencer/Getty ImagesYou write in your book that you were “pretty hostile” towards DRS at the start.
Oh yeah, I kicked the stumps over in a West Indies-Zimbabwe game. Both teams had walked off the field. Straight ball by Dwayne Bravo, hit [Chris] Mpofu on the foot, he’s turned round, limped off. Everyone’s gone back. I’m standing there with my partner. There’s a review just because they had one left. We had to bring them all back.That was in the old days. Talking to Paul Hawkins [inventor of Hawk-Eye] about it – some of the things then weren’t as good as they are now. You can watch it now and there’ll be the odd one you go, “Hmm, wasn’t sure about that”, but a high percentage of it is spot on. I remember being told, “HotSpot can’t work because it’s too sunny, too hot.” What do you mean by that? But that was back in the dark ages. Now you don’t get any of that.Speaking of technology at the outset of DRS: your decision to give Sachin Tendulkar out lbw to Saeed Ajmal during the 2011 World Cup semi-final – subsequently overturned on review – is still subject of debate today.
Don’t go down that road. I get teased about that. People send me pictures of my reaction after I was told in my ear by Billy Bowden that it was missing leg stump. It makes me laugh. It didn’t make me laugh at the time, I can assure you. But I’d give it out again with my back to the wall. It was dead. I don’t know what happened.ALSO READ: Are umpires giving more lbws now than they did before the DRS?Given the level of support they attract, were India the hardest team to officiate?
It’s intimidating. Not the players. The players are outstanding people. I’ve done seven, eight India-Pakistan games and the guys are real good people. They get on with each other. If you allow a crowd to get to you, all that noise and Mexican waves, or whatever, can distract you. Then you start missing bits and pieces and it’s a difficult place to be. But, you know, a couple of lads, last year or two years ago, did Bangladesh-Sri Lanka and there wasn’t one seamer picked in both sides. That would have been pretty difficult.You write that turning pitches were the hardest to umpire on. Did you have to learn to pick spinners’ variations too?
Yeah, you just went to the nets. I think some of the younger generation are missing out on that. They don’t want to go to nets. One good thing about the four English guys is, they go as routine. We’ve always done that and it’s been brilliant. Suddenly there’s a guy making his debut. If you don’t go to the nets, you’re never going to have seen him, so you’re now guessing. I just think it’s a big part of being professional. It’s something we’ve learned from David Constant, David Shepherd, Peter Willey. They set such a high standard. We didn’t want to fall away.

” I’m looking at myself: ‘What you thinking here, Ian, you’ve got six weeks in the Caribbean, in February, when it’s freezing in London.’ I didn’t want to do it”Gould on struggling with mental-health issues

What were the hardest decisions to call on the field?
Left-arm over, pitching outside leg stump. Those are the ones you’ve got to try and get right. You had people like Mitchell Starc – if it was his day, it started off stump and swung – whoa, you knew you were in business. But then when he didn’t quite get his action right, you weren’t sure whether it pitched on or not. Same with Mitchell Johnson.Probably one of the most difficult is the legspinner in the subcontinent where it has pitched in line. But once you got used to Hawk-Eye, with seamers, you knew that with a certain part of the pad, it should be going over the top of the stumps.The ball pitching outside is probably the most disappointing, and the legspinner over the wicket to a right-hander. Has that pitched leg stump? Has it spun too much? Those are the ones that are difficult. If it clips the glove, you’ve got no chance. That’s not a problem. But once you see the ball-tracking on the 90ft screen and it pitches outside, that’s a little hard to take.Did umpires have to change the way they assessed lbw appeals after DRS came in?
Yeah, your mindset changed completely. And you go the other way also, thinking, don’t forget [the stumps] are only nine inches wide and you’ve got umpire’s call on leg stump. There’s probably times you’d give that out in the old days, but you say “not out” now. Come on, Hawk-Eye, prove me right. The standard rate of umpiring under DRS is in the 90s. That is phenomenal. If you went to a racetrack and got 90% of winners, you’d be doing handstands.You write about the importance of relationships with players. Did that come from experience?
If I walk into a pub, someone says hello to me, I say hello back. Don’t turn your back on them. I think that’s crept into the game where maybe one or two umpires are a little bit unsure of a player. The English guys, we go to the nets, we talk, we practise. I was obviously louder and more boisterous than the other three, but people knew who I was, they knew they could go and have a laugh and it would get to a certain level. But they knew when it went past that level, I would come down on them like a ton of bricks. Some very “nice” things were said about me afterwards and that shocked me a little bit, because all I was doing was my job.Virat Kohli was one you often shared a laugh with.
He’s a funny man. Yeah, he batted like me a couple of times. I had to tell him off for slogging it. He’s a charmer. He’s one of those guys who’s got, a bit like Sachin Tendulkar, the whole of India on his back, but you wouldn’t know. You could walk into a restaurant and sit and chat with him for hours. He’s a very worldly boy. When you look at Virat, you’re thinking male model, pin-up boy, but he knows about the game inside out, the past, history. Lovely guy.”The standard rate of umpiring under DRS is in the 90s. That is phenomenal. If you went to a racetrack and got 90% of winners, you’d be doing handstands”•Ryan Pierse/Getty ImagesHe had his run-ins with authority in the past.
I can see why. But he’s learned to be respectful. He could have continued his career like that and people could be talking totally the opposite about Virat. He’s a nice man and the India boys are very, very good people, very respectful.You were the third umpire in Cape Town in 2018 and have said that Australia had gotten out of control in the lead up to the sandpaper episode. What was wrong with their general behaviour?
Laddish. Jack the lads they were. Now they are a completely different team. It’s probably the greatest thing that happened to them. You know, they were going through these pay talks. That would have been grinding people down. But there was only a few of them that were getting a bit hostile and in your face. I have spoken to some of the players and they probably didn’t see it, like me with my mental illness. But if there’s a few of you doing the same things, part of you thinks, “Well, that’s all right.” It just got out of hand.ALSO READ: Umpire suspicions about Australia led to Newlands stingHad you seen anything like players bringing sandpaper on to the field before?
No, not even in my social life. Not even someone stealing food from the tuck shop. I’d love to meet Cameron [Bancroft] again. Justin Langer is good friend of mine. He’s a great bloke, and he says, you’ve just got to meet this kid. I met him for about five minutes [at Newlands]. It was horrible for him. But I’d just like to sit opposite him and have a beer and talk it through. Because he’s got a great story. But I think he won’t be saying it until his career’s finished.A few weeks later in the Caribbean, you were on the scene of another ball-tampering controversy. Dinesh Chandimal denied a charge of altering the condition of the ball – but was later found guilty – and his team refused to take the field on the third morning of the Test. Why did that incident blow up in the way it did?
St Lucia. It was crazy. We tried asking the question. The thing was, Javagal Srinath, a brilliant man and very good referee, spoke to both teams before, concerning what happened in South Africa. Umpires are not going to catch players. Unless you do it right in front of my face, I’m not going to catch you. I’ve said this a million times and people look at me stupidly. But cameramen will catch you, so if you think you’re not going to get caught, I can guarantee you are going to get caught, because one camera will be designated to watch where that ball’s going all the time. I didn’t get why Sri Lanka were so hostile.

“Umpiring is now a young man’s sport. The players are expecting a lot more of you, to be a lot fitter”

You say in the book that Sri Lanka “got away lightly” and that you would have abandoned the Test and awarded it to West Indies.
They disrupted two and a half hours of international cricket. If everybody looked back on that, then I think there would be different decisions made. But that’s life. Those were the decisions made, those sanctions [a one-match ban for Chandimal] were in place at the time. I still can’t get my head around why they were so hostile. The manager and the coach were as hostile as I can remember. Dinesh Chandimal I knew reasonably well, but they started to say he doesn’t speak good English. Well, we did well not to giggle because we’d just listened to a post-match interview that he’d done in broad, fantastic English. I just think that if we went back on that, a lot of things would have been done differently.One other high-profile umpiring incident of recent times came during the World Cup final, when Ben Stokes deflected Martin Guptill’s throw to the boundary and was awarded six runs. Did you know the exact wording of the law on overthrows?
I’d be lying to say that I knew that. I had no idea. I know about the law, but the problem is that you’re looking at getting into position for prospective run-outs. Rod Tucker was third umpire and I don’t think he would have had enough time to be thinking that way. Thank god I wasn’t there. I was sitting on Brighton beach watching it. It all blew up later in the evening. Just some clever clogs went through a law book and it all came out.I think it was unfair. At the end of it, it’s going to be hard work trying to sort that all out. It’s split-second, and it’s a World Cup final as well. I should imagine the fourth umpire was scrambling around trying to find the balls that would be bowled [in the Super Over]. I can only imagine it.That World Cup was your last involvement as an international umpire. Do you miss it?
I miss the buzz. God, I miss the buzz. It was great fun. I just met some fantastic people, and I was so, so damn lucky to meet these people, and they were so kind, I’m just very grateful.Since you were in possession of the best seat in the house, who were the three best batsmen to watch during your time?
Jacques Kallis. I loved watching Jacques. He was a very, very fine player. Sachin. And probably Virat. I was unlucky in some respects. I didn’t see the best of Ricky Ponting. He was an outstanding character, outstanding captain, such a proud Australian. But his career was just starting to wane as I came on the scene. But he was incredibly helpful, so I’m disappointed I have to leave him out. Jacques Kallis, I could sit and watch all day, Virat, the same. And Sachin, if you want someone to bat for your life, he was the man.Within the space of three months in 2018, Gould was involved in two Tests that were overshadowed by ball-tampering incidents, in Cape Town by Australia and in St Lucia by Sri Lanka•Randy Brooks/AFP/Getty ImagesAnd bowlers?
Mitchell Starc on his day. Mitchell Johnson on his day. He bowled some very, very quick balls. And probably the one who gave me the biggest heart attack throughout my years – Saeed Ajmal. Lovely man, but he bowled all sorts of balls. On wickets that spun – I think Saeed would tell you he wasn’t the biggest spinner of a ball, but when you could get it going both ways, that’s tough. So Saeed, yeah, he was a very fine bowler, very clever bowler.What was the best batsman-bowler duel that you stood for?
Steyn versus Tendulkar, Cape Town. That was fierce but fair. That was as good as it got. I was stood there with a brilliant umpire, Simon Taufel, and the two of us came off and said, “Wow, we’d pay for that.” Dale bowled very quickly and Sachin just had the railway sleeper in his hand and kept patting it back at him. Fantastic.Is umpiring something you would recommend to younger people take an interest in?
The job’s changed completely. I was talking to someone yesterday, about an old photo of Frank Chester – he had a trilby on, coat down to his ankles, and a pair of brogues. All he needed to do was take off his umpire’s coat, put on a blazer and go straight to the pub. He didn’t need to change.I think the more people get to read books like mine, listen to podcasts with Richard Illingworth and Richard Kettleborough, and what’s written by the press – umpiring’s a very good job now. It can be exciting, exhilarating. I found umpiring, the day went quicker than playing, because you’re always doing something. It is a worthwhile occupation. At the ECB, we’ve got James Tredwell and James Middlesbrook, both ex-players, coming through at the right age. Because it is now a young man’s sport. The players are expecting a lot more of you, to be a lot fitter. It’s not the sort of job [where you can] play county cricket till you’re 42 and think, “Do you know what, I’ll go and do a bit of umpiring.” You’d have missed ten years of fun. On my behalf it’s a must, something that people should really look into.

How do the 2020 IPL captains stack up?

We analyse MS Dhoni, Rohit Sharma, Virat Kohli, Shreyas Iyer, Steve Smith, David Warner and Dinesh Karthik’s leadership styles in the league

Gaurav Sundararaman and Nagraj Gollapudi10-Sep-2020Down the years, teams that have won the IPL have had successful captains. Shane Warne, MS Dhoni, Gautam Gambhir, Rohit Sharma, to name a few, shaped their sides into match-winning units with their leadership.The IPL is considered the world’s best T20 tournament because of the high quality of talent overall and the intense competition for spots. Captains have the challenge of not just formulating tactics but also building a unified group from a pool of 20-plus players who comprise Indian and overseas stars and young, uncapped newcomers. Their ability to bring the best out of a diverse group of players in tight match situations is what has earned Warne, Dhoni and Rohit the tag of great IPL captains.We take a look at seven of the eight captains in this year’s IPL and their styles. (KL Rahul, the Kings XI Punjab captain, is not included because he has never led before in the IPL and has captained in only one senior level match.)

MS Dhoni, Chennai Super Kings

Dhoni owes much of his reputation as arguably the best T20 captain in the world to the Super Kings franchise, which bought him in the first IPL auction. Since then Dhoni has grown to become the final voice on cricket at the franchise, above even N Srinivasan, the owner. The Super Kings have made the playoffs every season, won the IPL three times, played eight finals and remained the most consistent team in the league. Man-management skills Dhoni possesses the ability to rally his players to adapt to his style, and he can manage his resources efficiently. Many players who have flourished under his IPL captaincy have gone on to play for India: Manpreet Gony, Sudip Tyagi, Mohit Sharma, Deepak Chahar among them. Winning the IPL in 2018 with a “Dad’s Army” is a testament to how Dhoni can mould the available resources into a winning unit. The team’s slowness in the field has been somewhat mitigated by Dhoni’s emphasis on them making up with better catching.Instinct or data? Dhoni has always been in the former camp – to the point where he has sometimes done exactly the opposite of what a data-led approach would recommend. A good example came in last year’s IPL when he asked Harbhajan Singh to bowl to Sunil Narine in the powerplay, counter to most teams, who looked to unsettle the Kolkata Knight Riders’ pinch-hitter with pace.As a wicketkeeper, Dhoni reads the pitch and sees angles better than other captains. He sets his fields diligently, positioning his fielders based on the pitch and the batsman at the crease.Remember the time? One example will not do justice to the legend of Dhoni and his tactics, but his getting Rayudu to open in the 2018 IPL took everyone by surprise. Rayudu delivered, scoring 602 runs at a strike rate of nearly 150.Girish TS/ESPNcricinfo LtdThe same year, Dhoni did not give a single over to his premier spinner, Harbhajan, in an all-important Qualifier clash against the Sunrisers Hyderabad. “I have a lot of cars and bikes at home but I don’t ride all of them at the same time,” he said when asked about it in the press conference. Dhoni has also sent the likes of Deepak Chahar and Harbhajan ahead of himself to counterattack after a top-order collapse.Where he could do better At times Dhoni seems to get rigid with his plans and does not look to innovate. This could mean he risks becoming predictable in unfamiliar conditions.What people say “You always got the feeling that he was one step ahead – whether he was or wasn’t was another thing, but you got the feeling he was.”
– CSK’s batting coach Michael HusseyIn his own words “After the first ball is bowled, it’s only chaos. What you are trying to do is you are trying to manage the chaos. It’s not like a script that happens.”

Rohit Sharma, Mumbai Indians

Rohit has won a record four titles with the Mumbai Indians, who appointed him captain in 2013. For tactical acumen he is second only to Dhoni, and like Dhoni he is calm in the face of pressure, but where the latter is all about instinct, Rohit is big on planning.Man-management skills Rohit’s leadership is based on simplicity, and he is not the sort to impose himself – an approach that has worked with players like Sachin Tendulkar, Lasith Malinga, Kieron Pollard, Harbhajan, the Pandya brothers, Jasprit Bumrah and others. As a captain, Rohit has given his players room to express themselves, and he has helped ensure the core group stick together.Instinct or data? Rohit is well known to be an intense tactician and a meticulous planner. He spends time with the analyst carving out plans for each batsman, which helps him make informed decisions on the field, particularly when it comes to match-ups and lines and lengths his bowlers need to pitch at each venue.Rohit Sharma: “I believe that when you are captain, you are the least important person”•Bikas Das/Associated PressRemember the time? Rohit has had his fast bowlers bowl bumpers at 140-plus to Chris Gayle and Narine, and deployed Bumrah against Glenn Maxwell and Krunal Pandya against AB de Villiers – evidence of planning. He also has surprised oppositions a couple of times with some X-factor selections: most famously, starting with uncapped Indian legspinner Mayank Markande in 2018; then replacing the successful Markande to play Rahul Chahar in 2019. Perhaps Rohit’s best-remembered move was in the last ball of the 2019 IPL final against the Super Kings, when he had Lasith Malinga bowl a slower ball to his Mumbai team-mate Shardul Thakur.Where he could do better Possibly the only area of concern is his own batting record in the IPL, which is significantly less impressive than his T20I record, where he strikes around nine runs higher, at 138.78. This has perhaps been down to the fact that for long he was not sure whether to open or bat at four – a question that has seemingly been answered in favour of opening.What people say “Rohit is an instinctive leader, for sure. But at the same time Rohit gathers a lot of information as well, I think that’s his strength.”
– Mahela Jayawardene on In his own words “I believe in a theory that when you are captain, you are the least important person. Others become more important in the larger scheme of things. It works differently for different leaders but as far as I am concerned, this theory works for me.”

Virat Kohli, Royal Challengers Bangalore

If captaincy is defined by titles, Kohli has done dismally in the IPL, while remaining his team’s best batsman. He is also still the best candidate for the job, as the franchise chairman Sanjeev Churiwala said recently. Kohli has said he wants to continue to lead by example and improve his players and make them more accountable, responsible and better.Man-management skills “Intent” is a word Kohli commonly uses while addressing media conferences. He is intense and expects the same intensity at all times from his players, at times forgetting that not everyone can turn it on the way he does, regardless of how many hours they spend working on their skills. However, over the last few years, Kohli has become more subtle about expressing himself as captain: instead of confronting, he now cajoles his players and gives them the space to grow, while not losing sight of the notion that in order to bring the best out of a player, you need to keep them on their toes.Those who have worked with Kohli, though, believe he needs to spend more time with the squad, and get to know particularly the Indian players better as people, which could come in handy in match situations.Although he helps check the runs with his fielding in the deep, Virat Kohli possibly needs to spend more time talking to his bowlers during the death overs•Rafiq Maqbool/Associated PressInstinct or data? Kohli reads the game like few can, and he can visualise outcomes and adapt quickly. He is not big on numbers, though not closed to it, and relies more on his reading of match situations and players. Occasionally he can be impulsive and go contrary to plans. In team meetings he is known to talk about opposition bowlers’ strengths, go-to balls and field placements, which his batsmen can utilise to plan accordingly.Remember the time? Kohli’s self-belief as a batsman is reflected in his leadership. Unlike Dhoni, who can quickly adapt to changing match situations, Kohli can be impulsive. However, in the 2019 IPL, he showed more clarity of thought. One good example was how he utilised Yuzvendra Chahal and Navdeep Saini. Chahal was tossed the ball to take care of overseas batsmen frequently, while Saini was let loose on the Indian batsmen, who were discomforted by his extreme pace and vicious inswing.On a sticky pitch against CSK in Bengaluru, Kohli brought Saini back into the attack in the seventh over to bowl to Dhoni. The bowler very nearly trapped Dhoni lbw with an inswinger after which Chahal kept things tight in the middle overs. Saini returned at the death and held Dhoni in check by bowling back of a length outside off stump, denying him his usual scoring areas.Where he could do better While Kohli has shown he can think on his feet, his grasp of match situations is occasionally questionable. And unlike successful IPL captains like Dhoni, Warne and Gautam Gambhir, Kohli fields in the deep, as one of the most athletic fielders around in the death overs. That is the phase of a match where Royal Challengers’ bowlers have struggled consistently and could perhaps do with counsel and an arm around the shoulder. Umesh Yadav, Saini, Mohammed Siraj have all shown they can dominate batsmen, but not regularly.Kohli could do with a little more focus on how to extract the best out of his players, how to convert an ordinary player into a consistent match-winner, and how to rely on his instincts and plans and experiment a bit more with combinations, which could provide more belief to his players.What people say “Virat has a different style of captaincy. He likes to be right in front every time, he likes to be leading from the front and be aggressive all the time. It is his style and it has suited him. Dhoni and Rohit keep the dressing room calm, while Virat makes sure that everyone is on their toes and they all keep pushing themselves.”
– Parthiv Patel, Royal Challengers’ wicketkeeper-batsmanIn his own words “I don’t care whether I am going to be judged on this [not winning IPL] or not.”

David Warner, Sunrisers Hyderabad

Appointed regular captain in 2015, Warner led Sunrisers Hyderabad to their first IPL title in 2016 and the team then made the playoffs the following year. The team’s best batsman, Warner has earned the respect of his peers and shares a good rapport with his leadership group, which also includes fast bowler Bhuvneshwar Kumar. Warner will return to lead the side for the first time in two years, having featured as just a player in the 2019 season.Girish TS/ESPNcricinfo LtdMan-management skills Luckily for Warner, the Sunrisers have never had too many senior players in their squads, and Warner has been a role model for the younger players, who have seen up close not just his intensity with the bat but also his thorough commitment in the field, where he is one of the most electric fielders. In addition to Rashid Khan, Warner has encouraged a lot of youngsters who have played a big hand in Sunrisers’ growth, including Siraj, Mustafizur Rahman and Siddarth Kaul.Instinct or data? Warner balances the two about equally. There have been occasions when he has looked at match-ups to dismiss batsmen. Getting Kumar to outwit an in-form Aaron Finch (his Australian opening partner) of the Gujarat Lions with an inswinger in 2016, for instance. Or, in the final that year, bringing on uncapped left-arm spinner Bipul Sharma to get rid of AB de Villiers at a crucial stage.Remember the time? In that 2016 final, Warner went against the tide in deciding to bat first after winning the toss, although the data suggested that it was wiser to field first at the Chinnaswamy, and the Royal Challengers were a strong chasing side back then. “We knew how well Virat went in that edition,” Warner said, looking back at the final earlier this year. “It was about backing ourselves. We won the toss and elected to bat first. I felt as a team our best attribute was defending the totals.” It was certainly a gamble, and in the 13th over of RCB’s chase, with the score at 140 for 1, Warner might have had some doubts about whether it would pay off. Standing at long-on and long-off, he remained in constant discussion with the bowlers and when Kohli fell in that same over, he held Mustafizur Rahman back for the death and continued with Bipul, who rewarded him with de Villiers’ wicket.Where he could do better Warner as captain has no real major drawbacks. He has missed captaining in the last two seasons due to off-field incidents and now has two IPL tournaments in the space of eight-odd months to showcase what Sunrisers have missed. Batting positions and overseas picks have been thorny issues for the side over the last two seasons and it will be interesting to see how Warner deals with them.What people say “Both the players [Warner and Kane Williamson] lead from the front as captains and I am sure it will continue in that way in whatever capacity these guys play. Also, I don’t see much difference in approach, but all I know is they are willing to do everything for the team
– Bhuvneshwar Kumar, in the David Warner, who led Sunrisers Hyderabad to the title in 2016, returns as captain after a two-season stint as a player•Mahesh Kumar A/Associated PressIn his own words “I don’t see it as a redemption tale, I just see it as an honour to captain the Sunrisers. I’ll put my thinking cap on and try my best to move us forward to another IPL title [he was captain when Sunrisers won the title in 2016].”

Steven Smith, Rajasthan Royals

Smith has a win percentage of 65.5 as captain in the IPL, having lost just nine times in 29 matches. He has had multiple captaincy stints with three different franchises; in fact, his first match as IPL captain was way back in 2012, when he was not a regular in the Australia set-up. He captained the Rajasthan Royals to a playoff spot in 2015, and missed winning the title for Rising Pune Supergiant by one run in 2017.Man-management skills Smith replaced Dhoni as captain at Supergiant in 2017, at a tough time for the team, which had finished seventh in 2016, and got them to squeeze through into the playoffs. Although it was not easy to step into Dhoni’s shoes, Smith did a good job. A number of young players came to the fore under his captaincy, among them Rahul Tripathi, Washington Sundar and Lockie Ferguson. Smith also backed senior pros Jaydev Unadkat and Manoj Tiwary by giving them specific roles in the team that allowed those two players to have their best IPL seasons during his tenure.Instinct or data? Smith strikes a good balance between the two. Royals are known to be scientific in their approach to picking players at auctions, as well as in planning for games. Smith’s stints with Australia, Royals and Supergiant have featured many strategies that have been role-specific and optimised for maximum success.Remember the time? The 2017 campaign had multiple instances where Smith played to his team’s strengths. Grooming Sundar to be a powerplay specialist for Supergiant paid off, particularly when Sundar took 3 for 16 against Mumbai Indians in the first Qualifier. Another time Smith took a leaf out of Dhoni’s book by placing three men straight down the ground for Pollard, which saw Pollard caught the very next ball while trying to hit Imran Tahir over deep extra cover.Rajasthan Royals haven’t reached an IPL final since winning the title in 2008. Can they do it under Steven Smith?•Bikas Das/Associated PressWhere he could do better Like Warner, Smith has not had recent IPL captaincy experience. He has three gun overseas players to help him out, but it remains to be seen whether he can rally youngsters and inexperienced Indian players to a title win. The Royals have not made the finals since the first IPL, in 2008, and Smith needs to be well up on the tactics front and also lead from the front with strong performances.What people say “MS is one of the greatest minds I have interacted with. And he is the best wicketkeeper in the world. The one mind ahead of Dhoni’s is Smith’s.”
– Sanjeev Goenka, Supergiant’s owner, to in 2017In his own words “My record probably is better when I’m captain than when I’m not. That sort of pressure doesn’t really bother me.”

Dinesh Karthik, Kolkata Knight Riders

Karthik was appointed captain by KKR in 2018, his debut season for the franchise. He was 32 then, one of the most experienced players in the squad, but had only led 18 times in the IPL, as interim captain during his stints at five other teams. It did not help that he was taking over from Gambhir, who had been the captain for seven seasons, during which the Knight Riders won the IPL twice. Man-management skills One of Karthik’s strengths is his approachability. Players have talked about the ease with which they can communicate with him. He has also not been averse to copping the blame when things go wrong, which allows players to trust him. Take the incident where Andre Russell criticised the team management over his place in the batting order in the first half of last year’s IPL, when the Knight Riders successively lost matches. Karthik soothed ruffled feathers one on one with Russell before things could descend into a blame game.Girish TS/ESPNcricinfo LtdInstinct or data? Unlike Gambhir, who was more instinctive, Karthik is big on planning, does his homework, and seeks information from the backroom staff on match-ups and strengths and weakness of the opposition.Remember the time? Karthik’s tactical strengths came to the fore against Chennai Super Kings in 2018. When Dhoni came to bat around the 12th over, Karthik brought Mitchell Johnson back into the attack, not giving Dhoni any time to settle. He then bowled Johnson out before the death, surprisingly reserving the final three overs of the innings for the spinners, Piyush Chwala, Narine and Kuldeep. Dhoni, accustomed to speed at the death, couldn’t take the attack to the spinners, who combined to give away 31 runs. KKR chased down the 178-run target with more than two overs to spare.Where he could do better Observers have spoken of how Karthik’s tendency to overthink as a batsman occasionally affects his leadership too, which can lead to him losing faith in players or his own decision making. Take the example of Yadav, who is no longer the go-to bowler he was under Gambhir. During Karthik’s captaincy, Knight Riders have played 30 matches in the last two seasons; Yadav has missed five of those, and in ten of the 25 matches he has played, he has not finished his quota of four overs.Those who have seen him up close believe Karthik could be more inclusive in taking on ideas from players before making his decisions.What people say “Just to remind you that under DK’s captaincy, we were one game away from the finals in 2018 and missed making the playoffs in 2019 because of NRR.”
– Knight Riders chief executive officer Venky Mysore, in the How will Dinesh Karthik utilise Kuldeep Yadav’s skills this season?•BCCIIn his own words “As a leader, I think having different opinions and dealing with it is one of the most important things.”

Shreyas Iyer, Delhi Capitals

At 25, Iyer is the youngest captain in the IPL. In 2018, the Daredevils bought Gambhir solely to get themselves an experienced captain, but the experiment was short-lived. Local boy Rishabh Pant has led Delhi in the Ranji Trophy, but when picking the captain, the team management, led by Ricky Ponting, went with Iyer, who had been the Emerging Player in his debut season in 2014.In 2018, the Daredevils finished bottom of the table but beat Chennai Super Kings and Mumbai Indians in their last two matches. A year later the team, rebranded the Delhi Capitals, reached their first playoffs since 2012, under Iyer’s leadership. Man-management skills Iyer has never been short on confidence, and his cricketing success has boosted that. He has been able to connect with players, including senior ones and overseas pros, easily. A lot of the talking in team contexts is done by Ponting, but on the field Iyer has been given the freedom to express himself and he has done well.After a long wait, Delhi Capitals reached the playoffs last season. Can Shreyas Iyer take them to their maiden final this season?•Surjeet Yadav/Associated PressInstinct or data? By his own admission, Iyer relies on instinct. But then he has Ponting in the camp, who takes data seriously, so Iyer can afford to take that kind of approach in what remains a learning phase for him.Remember the time? Iyer brought his reliance on gut feel into play in the last match of his first season as captain, in 2018. Mumbai were chasing 174 for a win and needed 18 runs off the final over, with an in-form Ben Cutting on strike. Both of Iyer’s two primary bowling options, experienced England quick Liam Plunkett and Haryana medium-pacer Harshal Patel had gone for at least 15 in one of their previous overs. Figuring that Cutting was comfortable reading Plunkett, Iyer backed Patel, who also had a better slower ball. The first ball was short and slow, going down leg, and Cutting hit it for a six. Patel followed it up with another short and slow delivery, this time wide outside off. Cutting tried to drag it to the leg side but mistimed the shot while reaching for it and was caught at deep midwicket. He wrapped up the game in the next ball to eliminate Mumbai from the IPL.Where he could do better Iyer is something of a straight talker, in the Ponting mould. As he grows into the leadership role, he might need to learn to temper that tendency, but without losing his honesty.What people say “He’s definitely become more comfortable in the role now, and has matured immensely. I’m very happy with how he’s shaped up as a leader, and all the international cricket exposure he has had is going to improve him further.”
– Ricky PontingIn his own words “When I got the Delhi Capitals captaincy in the middle of the 2018 season, I was not prepared for it. But I took it up as a challenge. Then in 2019 when I got to know that I was going to captain for the entire season, that helped me prepare mentally. I enjoyed it immensely, and in some sense it made me a better player. It helped me grow.”

Smart Stats: Rashid Khan BBL's all-time MVP, D'arcy Short the best batsman

The Afghanistan spinner takes top honours despite playing just 40 matches

ESPNcricinfo stats team08-Dec-2020Rashid Khan’s impact on the BBL has been incredible. In the last three seasons, he has taken 56 wickets at an average of 17.66 and strikes once every 17 balls. Khan concedes a boundary once every 11 balls. This means he conceded just about two boundaries per BBL match. That makes him the BBL’s Most Valuable Player ( MVP) across all nine seasons in spite of playing just 40 matches as per ESPNcricinfo’s Smart Stats. His conventional economy rate of 6.36 is the best in the league.Khan’s ability to trouble the opposition batsmen year after year shows his value to the Adelaide Strikers who bank on him to bowl all the tough overs. His economy rate in the middle overs in the last three seasons is 6.06 and he averages 14 runs per wicket. The next best average in this phase is 19.61, by Sandeep Lamichhane. Rashid also has taken 25% of the Strikers wickets since his debut in the BBL.ESPNcricinfo LtdAccording to Smart Stats, which looks at every batting and bowling performance through the prism of match context as well as the pressure on the batsman and bowler at each delivery, Khan’s 56 wickets were worth 72 and his Smart Economy was 5.09. While all other bowlers in his team strike at 28.7, Khan Strikes once every 17 balls.D’arcy Short is next in terms of impact points per match. His batting through the seasons has been top notch while his bowling has been useful too, and his impact for Hurricanes has helped him get a score of 53 points per match. There is little to separate the next three, with Jason Beherendoff, Nathan Coulter Nile and Glenn Maxwell completing the top five. Shane Watson, Chris Lynn, Aaron Finch, Marcus Stoinis and Travis Head are the others that make up the ten.ESPNcricinfo LtdThe bowlers dominated the overall impact but the most impactful performances in a match across nine seasons have come from batsmen. Short tops the match-wise top impact for his outstanding unbeaten 122 from 69 deliveries against Brisbane Heat in 2018. The next highest score was just 19 by Ben Mcdermott. While all batsmen struggled to get going it felt like Short was batting on a completely different wicket. Only one other batsmen had a strike rate of more than 100.ESPNcricinfo LtdStoinis features twice in this list – one for his all-round display, though in a losing cause, when he took three wickets and scored 99 from 51 balls, and another for his superb bowling performance under pressure to help Stars defend a total of 134. According to Smart Stats both these all-round displays comfortably trump his unbeaten 147 of 79 balls against Sixers earlier this year. Left-handers Craig Simmons and Matt Renshaw complete the top five.ESPNcricinfo LtdShort is also the best batsman in the BBL, according to Smart Stats. His impact has been outstanding for a team that has been heavily reliant on two players. Short’s batting impact score in the BBL is 40.29. He has scored 23% of the runs made by Hurricanes and plays an average of 29 balls per innings.Short has had to repeatedly play long innings to prevent the middle order from getting exposed, and he has done it with a lot of success. Short has two centuries and 15 fifties from just 43 innings. The fact that he plays for a team that does not have too many high-impact players puts him high up in the Batting Impact rating.Just like Short, Lynn faces the same challenge. Brisbane Heat also are heavily reliant on a couple of players to win matches for them. Lynn has had some amazing seasons for the Heat and has a score of 38.06. He is the league’s top scorer and has a Smart Strike Rate of 167.1, the best in the league. Aaron Finch, Usman Khawaja and Shaun Marsh complete the top five in terms of batting impact.

Raging pandemic, air travel, SOP loopholes – why IPL 2021 couldn't repeat UAE success

Six months after an incident-free tournament overseas, there was no room for error this time given the ground situation

Nagraj Gollapudi05-May-2021A resurgent pandemic with new strains, multiple positive cases within the eight IPL teams – including a few inside their bubbles – and the variables thrown up by the logistics: venues spread across India and the need for air travel. These were some of the key health-related points of difference between IPL 2020, staged in the UAE, and IPL 2021, which was postponed halfway through on Tuesday.Host cities

There were only three venues, all a drive away from each other, in IPL 2020: Dubai, Abu Dhabi and Sharjah. The day the tournament began, the UAE had 674 new cases; it crossed 1000 a week into the tournament and stayed at that level right through (1096 new cases on the day of the final).By contrast, all six venues in this IPL – Mumbai, Delhi, Bengaluru, Chennai, Kolkata and Ahmedabad – were hotspots when the IPL started. Mumbai, one of the first venues in the schedule, itself reported more than 10,000 new cases on April 6 and India’s total number of daily new cases in the week leading up to the tournament start was 100,000. The graph just kept going up: by Tuesday, May 4, when the IPL was postponed indefinitely, India was recording more than 350,000 new cases every day and 3500 deaths; the pandemic’s epicentre had shifted to Delhi, which alone was recording 20,000 cases every day and more than 400 deaths on a daily basis.What this meant was that any departure from the team bubbles would incur a hugely magnified risk – as is likely to have happened with the Kolkata Knight Riders’ Varun Chakravarthy, who tested positive on May 3. It is believed that Chakravarthy left the biosecure bubble (but followed protocols through the official “green channel”) to get a scan on an injured shoulder and that is one possible spot where he might have contracted the virus.Ahead of IPL 2020, every member of every franchise attended a workshop on Covid-19 to understand the guidelines put in place•BCCITravel

Probably the biggest point of concern for several franchises. In the UAE, the eight teams were based in Dubai or Abu Dhabi and travelled across the three venues by road using their own hired transport. At no instance would they have come in contact with someone outside the bubble.This year, though, teams travelled across four different cities, and all of it by air. Though the commute was on charter flights, and using private airports where possible including separate entry and exit points, there were still a lot of potential gaps in the bubble. For example, teams needed to undergo security checks at airports before boarding and after landing, which meant coming in contact with security persons outside the bubble – a loophole the franchises were concerned about.The concerns were first underscored when former India wicketkeeper Kiran More, who is part of the Mumbai Indians’ set-up, tested positive just before the tournament’s start (but while in the team bubble); it is believed he got exposed to the virus at an airport. More had checked into the team bubble in Mumbai in March, before the entire squad flew to Chennai, where they began the defence of their title. That a positive case emerged in a well-prepared franchise like Mumbai, which created its own bubble as early as in February, put other franchises on high alert.Covid-19 education and management

About a couple of weeks ahead of IPL 2020, every member of every franchise in the UAE dialled into a virtual call to attend a workshop on Covid-19 and understand the guidelines put in place in a biosecure environment, which was new to almost everyone at the time. This session was conducted by the BCCI’s medical experts, including Dr Abhijit Salvi, the board’s chief medical officer and anti-doping expert, as well as Nitin Patel, the Indian men’s team physiotherapist.The audience didn’t just hear the dos and don’ts, but also heard what the virus is and how it could transmit, and consequently, why it was important to respect rules in the biosecure bubble.There was no such session organised in 2021. This despite fears shared by players and coaches across teams, who were anxious about the surging infection rates across India. Around March 19, all stakeholders were handed the standard operating procedures about the medical protocol.A red carpet at the entrance to a ground is sanitised•Ron Gaunt/BCCIAnother difference from the last IPL was the absence of two key digital applications that helped monitor not just the health of the people in the bubble, but also tracked their movements. As soon as a person checked into the IPL bubble in the UAE, they had to download a Covid-monitoring app on a digital device. A thermometer and an oximeter, in some team hotels, had been provided to gather the individual’s health parameters, primarily meant to monitor any symptoms for Covid-19. This self-declaration was mandatory, and had to be submitted daily. Repeated failure to do so would prompt a hefty monetary fine for the individual. The person would be denied entry at the three venues, including for training, as the accreditation barcode was synced to the GPS tracker and health data app. Such a check-and-balance exercise, franchises have pointed out, was beneficial because if someone had symptoms, it was picked up quickly and the potential spread was curbed.Movement tracker

In the UAE, every member in the IPL bubble had to wear a GPS-tracking fob device around their necks like a pendant. This device tracked the person’s movements within the bubble and triggered a beep if there was any breach where the individual had crossed over into a zone where s/he was not permitted access. This was done by creating a geo fence within the bubble with pre-defined boundaries. Every individual had a distinct fob, with specified in-built boundaries based on the individual’s occupation. This tracker was outsourced to a UK-based agency for the 2020 IPL.Related

  • BCCI to conduct remainder of IPL 2021 in September-October in UAE

  • Charter flight may return Maldives-bound Australia players this week

  • The IPL 2021 team of the tournament (so far)

  • When and where can IPL 2021 be rescheduled to?

  • England counties offer to host remainder of IPL 2021 in September

However, in 2021, the BCCI engaged an India-based firm; franchises received the GPS trackers, in the form of a wrist watch, only on April 11, two days after the tournament had started and three matches had been played. The device was meant to track the person’s movements as well as log in the body temperature. A person had to download an app, called IPL BioTrack, on his/her personal phone where the data would be collected. But several franchises said that the device started to log in outdated data. One franchise wanted data from their second leg of IPL matches, but the data provided was from the first leg.Due to its unreliability, by the time the second leg of the IPL had commenced, members from several franchises confirmed they had stopped wearing the device because it had either stopped working abruptly or had hung. It is understood that franchises had to return the devices days before the IPL was postponed after being told the batteries would be changed.Bubble-integrity managers

In 2021, for the first time, the IPL appointed monitors in the form of bubble-integrity managers, up to four per franchise. Their sole job was to report any bubble breaches by squad members. However, franchises narrated incidents of their inefficient functioning – in one case, a manager was caught on camera leaving his room while in hard quarantine at one of the team hotels. Another incident involved some of these managers leaving the bubble boundaries during a live match to smoke. It is understood that more than one franchise questioned the IPL about the qualification of the officers, who are believed to have originally served as security liaison officers in previous editions of the IPL.Quarantine protocols

The IPL laid out quarantine rules both for before entering the bubble, and once inside the biosecure environment. The quarantine rules ranged from serving a hard weeklong period inside the team hotel and clearing mandatory tests before starting to train. In the case of any positive or asymptomatic case, the isolation period varied between a week and ten days outside the team bubble. The protocols applied not just for squads, but also for the franchise management as well as owners and family members.Devdutt Padikkal not serving a hard quarantine before the start of IPL 2021 had raised eyebrows•BCCIHowever, the inconsistency of the protocols was highlighted by the case of the Royal Challengers Bangalore batter Devdutt Padikkal, who tested positive on March 22. It is not known when exactly Padikkal tested positive, but the franchise said he had done home isolation of ten days.Subsequently, Padikkal travelled by road from his home in Bengaluru to Chennai, where his team was based during the first leg of the IPL, and even participated in training. Rival franchises questioned the logic behind allowing Padikkal to join the Royal Challengers’ training session without having undergone the mandatory quarantine and the testing process mentioned in the SOP. Franchises asked why the IPL did not allow senior franchise management officials or owners into the IPL bubble, subject to them clearing the required tests.Stadia

Both the 2020 and 2021 editions of the IPL were played behind closed doors. In the UAE, all venues were cordoned off with only authorised personnel allowed in. This edition, too, the IPL created different layers within the bubble at the stadia, with no one allowed to enter the area demarcated for the players and match officials. This included the groundsmen and the officials of the local state associations. The risk was highlighted in early April, when a swathe of groundstaff at Mumbai’s Wankhede Stadium, which hosted ten matches in the first leg of the tournament, tested positive, forcing the Mumbai Cricket Association to quickly find replacements from other venues within the city.It was shown up again in Delhi, where it is understood that two members of the groundstaff at the Feroz Shah Kotla, who were not at the ground over the May 1-2 weekend, had tested positive and had been placed in quarantine.Another example relating the vulnerability of the bubble was narrated by an official at one of the four franchises based in Delhi. This official said when his team was training at the Roshanara ground, owned by a private members-only club, in Delhi, the boundaries were porous and trespassers could easily access the zone where the team was training. There was barely any security to stop them, which was not the case during the first leg in Chennai and Mumbai. It is understood that a few of the club’s members wandered around the training making the squad members apprehensive. By Wednesday, two of the four franchises based in Delhi – the Chennai Super Kings and the Sunrisers Hyderabad – had reported four positive cases.

South Africa get a glimpse of their (potential) best XI before IPL gutting

With several of their key players leaving for India, there is an opportunity for those on the fringes to step up

Firdose Moonda04-Apr-2021This, South Africa think, is their best ODI XI. On the early evidence of their performance in Johannesburg, you might agree. Four of the top five scored half-centuries, two of those at a strike rate above 160. They had two century stands, and an overall run-rate that was consistently close to seven. Having asked Pakistan to pull off their highest successful chase, the quicks applied pressure and made enough early breakthroughs to swing the advantage their way inside 20 overs of the opposition’s reply.Related

  • Mark Boucher's problems grow as captain Temba Bavuma set to miss T20Is: 'It doesn't look good'

  • Stats – Fakhar Zaman records the highest ever individual score in an ODI chase

  • Fakhar Zaman's 193 not enough for Pakistan as series level

But in the last quarter of the match, they very nearly lost their way. With only five frontline bowlers, South Africa did not seem to have enough options to stop Fakhar Zaman. Tabraiz Shamsi was particularly expensive and probably should not have bowled his final spell, especially as Lungi Ngidi had an over in hand. Pressure, as it so often has in the past, threatened to take over but Andile Phehlulwayo held his nerve in the penultimate over, leaving Ngidi to defend 31 off the 50th. Off the first ball, Aiden Markram fired in a strong throw, Quinton de Kock’s gestures led Zaman to believe the ball was heading to the non-striker’s end when it was actually heading to him and Fakhar was run out, all but guaranteeing South Africa their first points on the World Cup Super League.They have those now, and remain in contention to win just their third trophy in nine series under Mark Boucher, but we all know one victory doesn’t make a summer and this one won’t make South Africa’s. All it does is give them an indication of what they can do when most parts of their game are working, just in time for this combination to be separated ahead of the decider. Almost half the XI will leave after this match for the IPL.The debates around the squad splinterting are multi-layered, not least because Pakistan have sent a full-strength playing group to South Africa in a pandemic and one argument is that the least the hosts could do is present their strongest side too.The reality is that Cricket South Africa (CSA) cannot afford to do anything else. Apart from the fact that the CSA and the BCCI have an agreement that the April-May window will be kept empty for the IPL, CSA’s Rands are no match for the IPL’s dollars and the contracted players would prefer to earn the latter. The next question will be whether this series could have been played at another time but in a calendar affected by Covid-19 postponements and rearrangements that is unlikely, so this is what South Africa have to deal with.”I wouldn’t say I am nervous,” the captain Temba Bavuma said. “We’ll go into the (final) game wanting to win the game and fortunate or unfortunate that we don’t have our main players available, the IPL boys. At the same time there is an opportunity for the guys on the fringes to really make a play for the team.”South Africa will be significantly weakened in the bowling department in the absence of Kagiso Rabada and Lungi Ngidi•AFPLet’s start by looking at the players South Africa won’t be able to call on. At the top of the order, they’ll be without de Kock, who didn’t look entirely at ease in the middle, but managed an assertive 80, came alive in the field, was often seen in conversation with Bavuma and played his part in the crucial run-out. They also won’t have David Miller, who Bavuma said is “hitting the ball as well as he has in quite a while,” and who contributed two aggressive half-centuries in the series, including his fastest, off 27 balls today.Perhaps most importantly, their first-choice pace pack of Kagiso Rabada, Lungi Ngidi and Anrich Nortje are all India-bound, leaving South Africa light on attack. As you may expect, that will test their depth. Replacements include Lutho Sipamla, Beuran Hendricks, Junior Dala, Daryn Dupavillon, Lizaad Williams, and Sisanda Magala who bring a selection of skills including control, variation and speed but have just 13 ODI caps between them.It will also ask questions of their team balance. In these two matches, South Africa opted for only five bowlers, which does not accommodate for the possibility that one of them could have an off-day. Today that was Shamsi. The only alternative option was Markram’s offspin which was used earlier in the innings and there is no doubt South Africa will want a more threatening alternative. The IPL exits present the option for an allrounder such as Wiaan Mulder or George Linde to be considered, which could also change the length of the line-up. Currently, Phehlukwayo is in at No.7 but South Africa may prefer to move him one down and include a second two-in-one player.At least South Africa will be able to keep the bulk of the batting lineup, including those who have found form such as Rassie van der Dussen and Temba Bavuma. Van der Dussen followed up his maiden hundred with a carefree 60 off 37 balls, although he was dropped on 0 for the second innings in succession. Unlike at SuperSport Park, when van der Dussen had to drag South Africa to a competitive total from 55 for 4, at the Wanderers, he had to build on a base of 169 for 2. He took on the spinners and was particularly strong on the sweep and is exuding a confidence in himself that South Africa will want to continue. He’ll want to avoid offering early chances, but won’t complain that Pakistan aren’t taking them.Temba Bavuma struggled initially but picked the pace later on; he will be key to the hosts’ plans in the final ODI•Getty ImagesSouth Africa will also have Bavuma, who would have been disappointed not to score his first hundred as captain. The pace at which he starts his innings could become a talking point, but he caught up quickly and played an array of attractive shots. Although not always known for it, Bavuma is an attacking player, who uses his feet well, punishes the short ball and drives beautifully.What they need is for Markram to start emulating the senior pair, especially after he looked in sublime touch for his 39. Markram has been dismissed 15 times in his 26 ODI innings for scores between 20 and 49, so his conversion rate is a concern that South Africa will hope can be addressed before this series ends.Janneman Malan is likely to partner Markram in de Kock’s absence while Miller’s departure opens up an opportunity for Heinrich Klaasen to bat higher and Kyle Verreynne to play. Klaasen had a good series against Australia last year and has not had much time in the middle in this series so far but can use the final match to make a strong case to claim a middle spot permanently.The reality is that South Africa’s best ODI XI is blurry as one victory suggests it should be. There are some personnel that are obvious keepers and some positions that are still up for grabs. Although Bavuma noted that “the batting effort was much better,” than in the first ODI, he acknowledged that “it would have been nice to finish the game a lot more clinically today.”So their best XI, it seems, is yet to be decided.

England contend with a hangover from a big couple of days

Home truth for hosts on a sobering day: they can’t rely on Anderson forever

George Dobell27-Aug-2021Well, life can’t be all sangria and zoo visits, can it? There’s often a hangover the morning after a perfect day.It wouldn’t be at all fair to suggest that England didn’t bowl well on the third day in Leeds. Neither fair or accurate. There were times, particularly in the first half of the day, when Craig Overton and Ollie Robinson bowled beautifully. And while, in India’s first innings, 71 false shots produced 10 wickets, in the second, 88 false shots have so far produced two wickets. We might not always like to acknowledge it, but luck plays its part.That’s not to say England’s performance couldn’t have been improved. There was, for example, a failure to review a leg-before decision (Joe Root actually appeared to call for it, but after the permitted time) which would have seen Rohit Sharma dismissed for 39. These things happen, of course, but an earlier review – also off Robinson – had looked optimistic and perhaps led to them not reviewing this time. It’s an area where calmer heads might lead to an improved performance.You could also make a case that England allowed the emotion of the situation to affect their performance for the second match in succession. On the second afternoon of this game, for example, with England three wickets down and the lead approaching 300, there was a case for knuckling down and grinding out an innings that lasted anything up to 200 overs. This would not only have kept a jaded-looking Indian attack in the field for longer, but put more wear into a pitch that looks easy-paced now. It might have been a tactic that had consequences for later into the series in terms of exhausting those bowlers.Instead, England took the attack to India. And while that was a perfectly reasonable tactic – they may have known they would need a long time to bowl India out – it was, perhaps, just a little naïve. It was the second day, after all. There really wasn’t any need to hurry. It’s just possible they could yet face a tricky final day.Related

  • James Anderson: 'Emotion got the better of me' after Bumrah barrage

  • England bask in a rare golden day

  • India fight back through resolute Pujara, Rohit and Kohli

  • As Joe Root takes the plaudits, Haseeb Hameed begins to reap what he sowed

James Anderson wasn’t quite at his best, either. So good has Anderson been for so long, that there might be a temptation to take his performances for granted. But he is 39 and here, in between trips off the pitch, he was hit for nine fours in 19 overs (he didn’t concede any in his eight first-innings overs) allowing Cheteshwar Pujara to settle in with a leg-stump half-volley to get off the mark.It’s now seven Tests – including this one and England’s innings defeat in Ahmedabad in March – since Anderson took a wicket in the second innings of a Test. Given how sparingly he was used in the first innings here and you wonder how relevant a statistic it is. But equally, given that he has taken 18 in the first innings of Tests in that same period it is hard to dismiss this as a coincidence. Indeed, going further back, he has now claimed just five wickets at a cost of 66.60 in the second innings of his 14 most recent Tests including this one. It might be noted he didn’t bowl in two of those second innings.But his record in the first innings of those 14 Tests is 40 wickets at an average of 17.30. It’s hard to dismiss that as aberrational.That’s not to say that Anderson should be dropped. That would be ridiculous. But he probably does need more support, not just from the other bowlers but from England’s batters who, all too often, don’t allow him they time he requires to recover between shifts with their inadequate performances. There might be a case for rotating him in series involving back-to-back games, too.In other circumstances, that support might have come from the likes of Stuart Broad or Jofra Archer. But, as it is, neither of them are available. And with England’s two best seam-bowling all-rounders, Ben Stokes and Chris Woakes, also on the sidelines, England have been persuaded to pick Sam Curran as a fourth seamer and No. 8 batter.There’s some logic in the selection, too. With his left-arm angle, his ability to swing the ball and his aggressive lower-order batting, he is, without doubt, a handy cricketer. It might be remembered, too, that he was England’s player of the series the last time India’s Test side toured in 2018.But in this series he’s taking his wickets at a cost of 79.33 apiece. And he’s conceding 3.21 runs an over, too. A batting average of 18.50 is hardly off-setting that relative impotence with the ball, either. Going back further, to the start of 2020, he is taking his wickets at 47.53 having not taken more than two in an innings in any of his 10 Tests. In the same period, he is averaging 17.08 with the bat.Blessed with neither great pace or great height, there are days when he looks short of the weapons required to be a viable frontline seamer. And for all the talk of his batting talent, he has played well over 100 professional matches – 73 of them first-class – without registering a century. He is, in short, looking more Ian than Tony Greig.England still hold many of the best cards in this match. They have a new ball to utilise at the start of the fourth day and they will know that India’s tail remains long and fragile. There’s not much margin for error available for India. But this was a sobering day for England. They can’t rely on Anderson forever.

India and Bumrah's faith in the process finally pays off

They have always stuck to their plans on this tour, but while it didn’t result in a win in Johannesburg, Cape Town has been a completely different story

Karthik Krishnaswamy12-Jan-2022It was a picture that seemed to sum up India’s day.Cheteshwar Pujara, their first slip, was flat on his stomach, watching the ball roll away from him, and Virat Kohli, their second slip, was setting off in futile pursuit as it made its way towards the helmet lying behind keeper Rishabh Pant. Temba Bavuma had just flashed at a wide one outside off stump from Shardul Thakur, and the edge had gone low between keeper and first slip. It reached Pujara at catching height as he dived to his left, but he failed to hold on.A drop, and five penalty runs. The wound and the salt.India’s bowlers had been at South Africa’s batters all day, hovering in the corridor outside off stump, extracting movement both ways, and usually either beating the edge or finding it only for the ball to fall short of the cordon – or, in this case, reach it and get shelled. And if there was an lbw shout, height inevitably came to South Africa’s rescue.For their second successive innings on the field, India were doing most things right without getting the reward for it. The previous time had been South Africa’s fourth-innings chase in Johannesburg, where the bowlers had induced 62 false shots and only picked up three wickets. Other factors had contributed to India’s defeat, such as rain making conditions easier to bat in on the fourth day, and the taller South African bowlers being able to better exploit an up-and-down pitch than India’s, but you couldn’t deny the role luck had played.It seemed to be happening all over again. India had been bowled out for 223, and South Africa, following that drop, were 143 for 4.During India’s innings on day one, South Africa’s bowlers had induced 64 false shots while picking up ten wickets in 77.3 overs. India induced their 64th false shot in the 56th over of South Africa’s innings, 5.3 overs after Pujara’s drop. This time, Mohammed Shami found Bavuma’s edge with a ball that straightened dangerously in the fifth-stump channel. The edge may have fallen short of a less athletic second slip, but Kohli dived to his left to complete an outstanding two-handed grab, his 100th catch in Test cricket. South Africa were 155 for 5.India have at times been rather unlucky on this tour of South Africa•Associated PressIndia’s bowlers had induced the same number of false shots as South Africa’s bowlers, for exactly half as many wickets.But their luck was beginning to turn. Two balls later, Shami straightened another from that hard-to-ignore line, and Kyle Verreyne poked and nicked. Another low chance, and Pant completed it with a dive to his right.Process. You’ll hear the word at every pre-, post- and in-match press conference, and you’ll hear it so often that you’ll ask yourself if it has any meaning beyond this set-piece situation that neither you nor the player really wants to be part of, deep down, but it truly is the cricketer’s bread and butter. It really is all about the process.Right through this series, India’s bowlers have stuck to their processes, whether they’ve brought about the desired outcomes or not. Even when Dean Elgar was steering South Africa to a stirring victory at the Wanderers, India – except for a couple of passages late in the game, when a bit of desperation set in – didn’t waver too much from their plans to him or his colleagues. The ball kept going past Elgar’s outside edge, and they kept looking for it.On day one at Newlands, Jasprit Bumrah found Elgar’s outside edge with the kind of ball he had bowled multiple times without luck to the same batter only a few days earlier. Bumrah and Elgar will both know that Elgar not out 96 and Elgar c Pujara b Bumrah 3 were wildly fluctuating outcomes of the same processes.Those fluctuations aren’t unusual on an innings-to-innings or match-to-match basis. But they tend to even out over longer periods, and over the course of series, seasons, careers and eras, the players and teams who execute their processes in the most relentlessly skillful way usually end up tasting the rewards they are due.Jasprit Bumrah finished with 5 for 42•Gallo Images/Getty ImagesOn day two at Newlands, the quality of India’s bowling eventually reaped the rewards it was due. It earned their team a narrow first-innings lead that may well prove critical in their quest for a first Test series win in South Africa.And most fittingly, Bumrah, who had taken just one wicket over 38 mostly excellent overs in Johannesburg, ended up with figures of 5 for 42.
Inevitably, Bumrah’s press conference at the end of the day’s play featured a heavy emphasis on process.”Nothing extra-special or out of the ordinary. I was just focusing on what I had to do, and I was trying to focus on my routines and my processes and what I do, basically, before a Test match, or whatever has to be done whenever I prepare for a Test match,” he said, when asked if he had been especially fired up for this occasion. “So, nothing out of the ordinary; I was not giving any extra attention or I was not really angry or, I was just focusing on what I had to do, I was just trying to be in the present.”Coming into this game, there had been plenty of scrutiny around Bumrah’s recent form. His lines and lengths had been pored over in other publications; this website had noted a seeming lack of bite in his shorter lengths.There may well have been merit to all those critiques, but the dominant feeling Bumrah has evoked over the last few months is of bowling well without necessarily picking up bagfuls of wickets. And Bumrah knows how capricious the relationship between process and outcome can be.”See, the success, whatever comes, is a byproduct, so what we try to do is have a routine, try to follow that again and again, and maybe create pressure as a bowling unit,” he said. “Some days I would get wickets, some day somebody else would get wickets, but we as a unit want to focus on our routines and we know what has worked for us, so trying to stick to our plans, and then evolving the game around it.”Yes, there will be doubters, there will be people who’ll be praising, but that is something that an individual has to decide, so I try to focus on what I have to do. If I’ve given any attention to the outside noise, it doesn’t really help, so at the end of the day when I bowl, I try to control [what I can control], and I try to have my perspective towards bowling, so I try to avoid whatever else is going on around the world.”Maybe some people like my bowling, some people might not, but my focus is always to back my processes, back my routines, and try to give the best that I can for the country.”If Bumrah has fallen short of anything at all over his last few Test matches, it’s probably only been his own absurdly high standards.On Tuesday and Wednesday, he lived up to those standards. And as he always does, he left you with moments you’ll remember for a long, long time. The first ball of the day jagged away from Aiden Markram, perhaps inducing the batter to leave the second, which pitched on virtually the same spot and nipped back in to knock back off stump.You’ll remember that ball, and you’ll remember the look Bumrah directed at Marco Jansen after straightening one past his outside edge to hit the top of off. You’ll remember those moments, but to really understand the excellence of Bumrah and this India attack, you must also remember all the balls in between that didn’t take wickets but induced just as much discomfort.

The (un)dew advantage: what choice do teams batting first have?

They will invariably be looking to put on massive totals – like Kings tonight, it might lead to their downfall, but it also might be their only chance

Karthik Krishnaswamy01-Apr-20222:37

Zaheer on dew: ‘Need to accept challenges and deal with them’

That dew has had an exaggerated impact on IPL 2022 is clear not just from the results so far – chasing teams have won seven of the first eight games – but also from how the players and coaches have spoken about it.”We’re going to bowl first,” Shreyas Iyer, the Kolkata Knight Riders captain, said at the toss on Friday, “and the reason is obviously the swimming pool in the evening, which we’ll see.”Related

  • What IPL week 1 taught us: dew, middle-over mantra and new Indian talent

  • Report – Russell's 70 off 31 helps KKR brush aside Kings

  • Fleming on dew factor: 'At no stage did CSK feel comfortable'

  • Did too much intent trip up KKR on a tacky track?

Just under 24 hours before that, Moeen Ali had worn a haunted look while being interviewed by host broadcaster Star Sports between innings. “It’s going to be difficult because of the dew and they [Lucknow Super Giants] have a brilliant batting line-up,” he said. “We are going to have to bowl well.” These were the words of a man whose team, Chennai Super Kings, had just scored 210.Super Kings duly lost that game. It was the third time the 200-mark had been breached by a team batting first this season, and the second time it had been chased down.Punjab Kings had chased down 206 against Royal Challengers Bangalore on the second day of the tournament, and had done so with an entire over to spare. You can understand, then, why they batted the way they did when Knight Riders sent them in on Friday.It’s a strategy that can look spectacular when it comes off, and for a while it looked like it might, particularly when Bhanuka Rajapaksa clattered Shivam Mavi for 4, 6, 6, 6 in the fourth over of the match.It can also bring about flurries of wickets, and cause teams to be bowled out inside 20 overs. This was Kings’ eventual fate on Friday, as they folded for 137 with ten balls of their innings unused.Punjab Kings’ attacking approach didn’t come off on Friday•BCCITeams batting first know, of course, that they risk being bowled out for 135 if they set their sights on 220. But Kings still chose that approach. So did Knight Riders two days ago; they went just as hard and collapsed just as spectacularly against Royal Challengers.That these teams chose this approach over a more conservative one that might have brought them 170 at best or 150 at worst should tell you all you need to know about their assessment of the conditions. They didn’t think they could win with 150 or 170. As the ESPNcricinfo columnist Kartikeya Date might put it, they chose competitiveness over respectability.It didn’t come off for Punjab on Friday, just as it didn’t come off for Knight Riders on Wednesday. But equally, it came off for Super Kings on Thursday, but it didn’t matter; they still lost, their bowlers powerless to defend 210 in another second-innings swimming pool.It’s too early to predict if the rest of the season will follow the same pattern, but it’s hard to see it change too much, given that the same four venues will host all of the league phase, and that three of them experience the coastal humidity of Mumbai.The dew probably won’t go away. At least some of the teams will continue setting their sights on mammoth first-innings totals in a bid to overcome the disadvantage of losing the toss. It will come off sometimes, it won’t come off at other times, but it will probably remain their only way to give themselves a chance.

Mitchell Marsh, the comeback king

Time and again he has been written off, time and again he proves people wrong

Shashank Kishore12-May-2022″Most of Australia hate me. There’s no doubt that I’ve had a lot of opportunity and haven’t quite nailed it, but hopefully they can respect me for the fact I keep coming back… hopefully I’ll win them over one day.”This was Mitchell Marsh, speaking after picking up his maiden Test five-for in 2019. It was supposed to be a happy occasion, but it was overshadowed by a decade of under-performance. After all, Marsh had first made heads turn in 2010, at the Under-19 World Cup, and later that year for the Deccan Chargers as an 18-year-old.At the time, Adam Gilchrist, captain of the defending champions, spoke glowingly of the boy from Perth who could hit a long ball and take big wickets. He was deemed the “perfect package”.Little did Gilchrist, or anyone else, know that Marsh would play all of 27 IPL games over the next 12 years. Or for that matter, no more than 36 T20Is for Australia since his debut in October 2011. But he kept coming back. Not quite as the finisher that everyone expected to be, but as a No. 3 who would go on to win a T20 World Cup.Related

  • Marsh ticks the right boxes as an evolved No. 3

  • Report: Bowling, Marsh, Warner keep Capitals in mid-table joust

  • Scenarios: Capitals have a genuine chance of qualifying for playoffs

On Wednesday, nearly six months after that surreal innings in the final in Dubai, Marsh was at it again. And like then, there was no inkling of this being his night. Covid-19 had pushed him to the sidelines of an IPL season which began while he was nursing a hip flexor injury.When you’ve been as injury prone as Marsh has been, you’re playing as if every game is possibly your last. Remember the opening game of IPL 2020? A hobbling Marsh, who was one of Sunrisers Hyderabad’s big-ticket signings, had to leave the tournament due to a “moderate- to high-grade syndesmosis injury” in his right ankle and saw his season go up in smoke.This wasn’t a final, but the stakes were still high. Delhi Capitals, his third IPL franchise, had outbid Sunrisers, his former team, and new entrants Gujarat Titans to secure his services of INR 6.5 crore (USD 866,000 approx) for precisely magic like this. A chase of 161 a sluggish pitch was no walk in the park for a team that had to win to keep their playoff hopes alive.Then, he walked into bat at the fall of the first wicket in the very first over. The scoreboard didn’t move for the next two, as Rajasthan Royals, perhaps the best bowling attack in the competition, kept coming at him. Marsh’s season – not to mention his whole team’s as well – was going to be defined by the passage of play over the next 90 minutes.He was initially at sea when Prasidh Krishna tested him with hard lengths. Inside edges rolled off the pads, out swingers whizzed past the outside edge, cut shots going nowhere, playing and missing at deliveries that reared up – it was all happening. But Marsh didn’t seem agitated, not even after playing out a maiden over.In the third over, he had a massive slice of luck. The ball from Trent Boult swung in late and struck him on the boot right in front of the stumps. Royals appealed but the umpire was unmoved. Everyone thought there had been an inside edge. There wasn’t. Marsh was on 1 off 9 deliveries. As he looked at the replay on the giant screen, there was a grin and a fist bump with Warner.Marsh: Warner opening and me batting at three, we’ve had a lot of great partnerships•BCCI”If you looked at the powerplay tonight for both teams,” Marsh said later, “the ball was swinging around, also nipping around, probably one of the toughest powerplays I’ve batted in since I started playing T20 cricket. We just had to get through that unscathed. If we are two or three down, the game gets really hard. So we assessed that we have got to cut back on our runs and make sure we’re just one down at the end of the power play.”Lot of credit to them [Royals], they bowled exceptionally well in the powerplay to us and made it really tough, but chasing 160, you only need that one big partnership and that was our main focus. The last 18 months, I’ve loved batting with Davey [Warner]. Him opening and me batting at three, we’ve had a lot of great partnerships. Tonight was a memorable one for the Delhi Capitals.”Marsh made the plan sound simple, but it needed a lot of work, starting with a change in stance. Normally, he bats on leg stump and then shuffles across just as the ball is delivered. But that was leaving him wide open to Boult’s inswingers. So, he took guard just a little outside leg stump. Now he could keep his natural trigger movement and not worry about the lbw.R Ashwin came on for the next over. Marsh had seen enough. Length deliveries into the pitch were causing batters some discomfort. He knew that because that had been his earlier in the night – mixed in with cutters and slower ones – to pick up two massive wickets. At the first sign of something full, Marsh opened his shoulders and crunched Ashwin for six over long-off. He had picked the carrom ball off the hand and went inside-out. It came as a massive relief. The fist bump with Warner after the shot, which he stood back and admired on the giant screen, told you how much he enjoyed it. It was the start of superb spell of batting.Marsh was in control even without really imposing himself. He played to his strengths rather than trying to outfox the bowler or second guess what was coming. It was just simple and clean hitting that comes from picking the lengths – and the spin – early. It must have helped that he was batting with a great mate. Warner was with him at the other end on that famous night in Dubai. And he was with him again, just turning the strike over so he could sit back and watch from the best seat in the house.As if to say thank you, Marsh provided a power-hitting exhibition. The two sixes he hit off Kuldeep Sen in the seventh over – dead straight and over the sight screen – were right out of the top drawer, By then he’d raced to 39 off 28 even as Warner was a run-a-ball 12. The six to bring up his fifty as he took on Chahal was a sign of complete mastery over his batting. From there on, it was a cruise.”In terms of the way he goes about it, he’s someone I’ve looked up to for a long time now,” Marsh said of Warner. “I’ve been very lucky, over the last 18 months, to have been able to bat with him a lot and form a great partnership and great friendship. The friendship side of things comes out in the middle of the game. His experience, calmness – you can all see how much he loves winning. It feels like he’s back to where it all began for him. He’s been super consistent this year, I love batting with him.”Marsh couldn’t quite finish the job, but by the time he was dismissed in the 18th over, he’d made 89 off 63 and taken the Capitals to the doorstep. As he walked back, soaking in the applause, he had served a quiet reminder, something that he has had to right through the career. That he wasn’t to be counted out. Not now, not for the next few years. At 30, the possibilities are endless.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus